- Feb 15, 2012
- 17,143
- 47,083
So you're saying Universal doesn't care about the quality of its product? Most of what I've seen looks pretty good by comparison.
Profit through quality.
So you're saying Universal doesn't care about the quality of its product? Most of what I've seen looks pretty good by comparison.
Profit through quality.
Thank you.
I think he's saying that Universal understands that the quality of the product is directly proportionate to their revenue, which is true.So you're saying Universal doesn't care about the quality of its product? Most of what I've seen looks pretty good by comparison.
I think he's saying that Universal understands that the quality of the product is directly proportionate to their revenue, which is true.
What Disney is doing, overall, IS SUCCESSFUL. :tongue: I don't like what Disney has been doing, but you can't say it's NOT successful.
You and your family and your opinion is that you don't want 3D Sim stuff.And no one said Uni isn't successful, we are saying people don't want more 3D Sim stuff.
And no one said Uni isn't successful, we are saying people don't want more 3D Sim stuff.
Opinions are like mix tapes....
Agreed. Which is why we have so many debates on here. Some people want X and others want Y. Heck, some topics two people are on the same side and in another topic those same people are on opposite ends. In the end it comes down to which is the popular opinion, time will tell and I don't think any of us can say down the line how popular or unpopular this ride will be. We are all speculating.You and your family and your opinion is that you don't want 3D Sim stuff.
Me? And my family? And my friends? Bring it on.
Opinions are like mix tapes....
Don't kid yourself, that is Universal's only end game as well. They're doing it through a different strategy, but that's all they care about.
No, I'm hoping for something awesome and not repetitive. All I'm asking is for variety.Universal's forte is projection technology. Disney's is robotics. Disney uses projection tech, and Universal uses robotics. But their strengths are what set them apart. Universal beceame a thing when they STOPPED copying Disney. I don't see them reversing course. If you are looking for Disney style attractions, there are a plethora of them 12 miles southwest of UOR.
No, what I was saying is if you are looking for Disney style attractions (i.e.: AA centric), Disney is where you should go to get them. Whining about the fact that Universal is doing what Universal does best seems pointless to me. And calling Universal lazy is laughable.No, I'm hoping for something awesome and not repetitive. All I'm asking is for variety.
There seems to be more protectionism than an actual defense of screens, especially telling people to go 12 miles of UOR if you don't like it. Sheesh, I can love UNI and still criticize aspects that bother me. I can't help but think that if we had the Sesame Street and Madagascar attractions here, people who are dissing slow moving waxy rides wouldn't have a problem with it, and the complaining about screens would steadily decrease. The fact the debate is so hot shows the issue is not anecdotal.
Simulators are lazy, IMO, and I always felt parks fell on them for lack of space, that's why the f&f attraction baffles me.
Whylightbulb told me that all future UNI attractions will feature screens, but not all will be screen based. I'm fine with that.
I didn't call them lazy, I said simulators are lazy.No, what I was saying is if you are looking for Disney style attractions (i.e.: AA centric), Disney is where you should go to get them. Whining about the fact that Universal is doing what Universal does best seems pointless to me. And calling Universal lazy is laughable.