What's the general consensus outside of us theme park wonks? Is there any, yet?
Funny enough, to add into the bill; when I had Derek Burgan (Touring Plans) on a podcast that I, myself hosted last night; as he told of an outsider's POV on Fallon. And it seems that the outsider, actually quite liked it, and raved about it while Derek was at a store.
The GP is the audience that I am most curious to see the survey's come out on. Not the people that attend the parks often enough to notice many of it's flaws, but those who plan to come every once and a while, rarely.
Fallon is going to be a hit, when you consider that even with the ratings down a bit, it's still one of the most popular late-night television shows out there right now. And it'll bounce up in the near future, although that's more on how long the political..happenings, last. There is a cycle, and it will evolve eventually. As Comcast and NBCUniversal (along with Fallon) probably notice, and that there will be change for the better (or the worst).
What might that podcast be?
So what was the Ghostbusters attraction ?
So what was the Ghostbusters attraction ?
So basically..... this ride's overall review is all over the place
It's almost as if enjoyment of a comedy ride was as subjective as enjoyment of comedy itself.
So basically..... this ride's overall review is all over the place
Yea, definitely a good addition to the park. If for anything just as a people eater. Without Twister, Disaster, and Beetlejuice not only is the park lacking in atttractions, but attractions that took 30 mins of your time each.What makes an attraction a "success"? Is it average wait time? Is it attendance increase? Is it merchandise sales? Is it survey scores? Is it media reviews? I think it is very difficult to determine if an attraction is a 'success' or not, especially from our eyes. I think any new attraction is a positive for the park. I loved Twister back when it opened but I must say the last time I rode it a few months before it closed I was less than impressed by it. Not every ride has to be ground breaking. All it has to be is entertaining and relevant. I will not ride until September but I believe this attraction appears to have entertaining aspects and will have decent merchandise sales. Overall this appears to be a positive addition to the park.
That's what I was going at. It seemed like pre-launch Disney Springs had really low expectations. But, they've hit home runs all the way.Whoa there, the Disney Springs dining is well deserving of any praise it's receiving. Outside of Planet Hollywood, the new dinging has been home run after home run.
If only that came back as a ride...I was hoping with the reboot would increase interest in the brandSo what was the Ghostbusters attraction ?
Seems like the last couple of rides have been this way...From great to meh...I think with screen rides there is a good amount of getting lost in the ride that needs to be accomplished...To some the 360 scene in Kong is a vast forest with a giant battle taking place all around you. Other people see it as two movie screens with a video playing...So basically..... this ride's overall review is all over the place
In my opinion they measure success by how full each ride vehicle is over an extended period of time and guest reactions after the ride (survey scores and guest watching.)What makes an attraction a "success"? Is it average wait time? Is it attendance increase? Is it merchandise sales? Is it survey scores? Is it media reviews? I think it is very difficult to determine if an attraction is a 'success' or not, especially from our eyes. I think any new attraction is a positive for the park. I loved Twister back when it opened but I must say the last time I rode it a few months before it closed I was less than impressed by it. Not every ride has to be ground breaking. All it has to be is entertaining and relevant. I will not ride until September but I believe this attraction appears to have entertaining aspects and will have decent merchandise sales. Overall this appears to be a positive addition to the park.
What makes an attraction a "success"? Is it average wait time? Is it attendance increase? Is it merchandise sales? Is it survey scores? Is it media reviews? I think it is very difficult to determine if an attraction is a 'success' or not, especially from our eyes. I think any new attraction is a positive for the park. I loved Twister back when it opened but I must say the last time I rode it a few months before it closed I was less than impressed by it. Not every ride has to be ground breaking. All it has to be is entertaining and relevant. I will not ride until September but I believe this attraction appears to have entertaining aspects and will have decent merchandise sales. Overall this appears to be a positive addition to the park.