What about MIB becoming a Pokemon Snap ride?
NoWhat about MIB becoming a Pokemon Snap ride?
That doesn't make senseWhat about MIB becoming a Pokemon Snap ride?
A Pokemon interactive ride would be great but can we not even give the idea of lazy overlays to Universal? They're not Disney so we shouldn't need to worry too much, but just in case...
Only if there was an animatronic GLaDOS, that'd be amazing.Considering Universal is the king of screens, a Portal type shooter would be awesome. I'm sure UC teamed with Valve could come up with something to let us play with our own Portal gun. Aside from that, just give me some sights on my blaster!
Reading this thread made something occur to me. Why is a ride that takes place in New York in a land called "World Expo" but an Egyptian Tomb is in a land called "New York." Shouldn't it be the other way around? It doesn't really matter, but I thought that was weird.
The cake is a lie.Only if there was an animatronic GLaDOS, that'd be amazing.
Technically both Simpsons and DM are overlays in the way you're describing.I don't think they ever will. They could've done it with Disaster/F&F (and Kongfrontation/Mummy) but chose not to.
Well, that was close Also, I heard there are hidden targets/sensors under the big bug. Where could I find those? And is there a dot or mark that identifies the sensors on the aliens on MIB?
I rode rock it today and it was rough as hell. on the other hand, reign of Kong soft opened and I was lucky enough to be able to ride it!Neither of these rides should be going anywhere. Both are very popular with guests. They are still my two favorite rides in the Universal Studios park. Gringotts, Transformers, and Rip Ride Rocket can't top those rides for me.
Neither of these rides should be going anywhere. Both are very popular with guests. They are still my two favorite rides in the Universal Studios park. Gringotts, Transformers, and Rip Ride Rocket can't top those rides for me.
They are both older attractions and both are franchises that don't sell merchandise. Which puts them in the danger zone for Universal, like it or not. I don't think either close in the next few years, but they will be on the hot seat in the future. As they should be, if Universal can close Kong and Jaws they can close these rides. Best case for fans of the Mummy is the ride gets a overlay for the new rebooted film.
Yes, I strongly agree with you.MIB has the advantages of being a unique ride, plenty of AA, easy for young and old to ride and is great for reriding. Mummy is still considered mainly a roller coaster. I think as long as the ride systems hold up Universal has too many other priorities on its plate.
I think Universal is thinking more about capacity now. Replacing any more existing big rides will not help with that.
What the Mummy has going for it is is continually ranked as a ride with the highest guest satisfaction. It's 12 years old and it still brings 'em in. I know it's my favorite at USF, it's many of my friend's favorites, and I hear more positive things coming off that ride than I do any other in that park.They are both older attractions and both are franchises that don't sell merchandise. Which puts them in the danger zone for Universal, like it or not. I don't think either close in the next few years, but they will be on the hot seat in the future. As they should be, if Universal can close Kong and Jaws they can close these rides. Best case for fans of the Mummy is the ride gets a overlay for the new rebooted film.