If Disney did Harry Potter it would've been TSMM with wands. Seriously. That was their pitch to Rowling.Lol, if Disney were the ones to do HP Hogsmeade would be coming out next year.
If Disney did Harry Potter it would've been TSMM with wands. Seriously. That was their pitch to Rowling.Lol, if Disney were the ones to do HP Hogsmeade would be coming out next year.
I'm definately not saying it isn't, but over half of the comments are along the lines of "Another Universal simulator, yawn" or "Too many screenz!" and they're acting like Disney never does screens and has no fault and whatever.For the record POTC is very impressive..It is very heavily screened tho..The Captain Jack and Davy Jones AA are pretty cool as well
Can't handle opinions?The comments on the video are really pissing me off.
I bet you $100000000 that the same exact people were praising the ride through videos of POTC in Shanghai. So stupid.
You just told me a bunch of stuff I didn't know. Do you know what part of the scene they want to amend? Entrance, whole thing, Exit?
Opinions...learn to understand opinionsAre you trolling it's a brilliant but flawed ride from what I'm hearing the 75 min wait tonight tells you it's not a flop
Oh please. I can handle opinions, but I don't enjoy people acting like Disney is superior to Universal because Disney doesn't do "screenz" when the most praised ride at Shanghai Disneyland right now uses just as many "screenz."Can't handle opinions?
I'm definately not saying it isn't, but over half of the comments are along the lines of "Another Universal simulator, yawn" or "Too many screenz!" and they're acting like Disney never does screens and has no fault and whatever.
Oh please. I can handle opinions, but I don't enjoy people acting like Disney is superior to Universal because Disney doesn't do "screenz" when the most praised ride at Shanghai Disneyland right now uses just as many "screenz."
The majority of the ride was made up of physical sets, and the ride vehicles reacted to the scene. I don't think the two are good comparisons, tbh. And, from the vids, the ratio was well balanced and the screens complemented the physical sets.I'm definately not saying it isn't, but over half of the comments are along the lines of "Another Universal simulator, yawn" or "Too many screenz!" and they're acting like Disney never does screens and has no fault and whatever.
Also, I reeeally think we need to slow down with our judgement of the ride. I'd give the ride a good month or so before we start deciding if this ride is a success or failure, good or bad, general resort ranking, etc. As it stands, most of us haven't ridden it and have only seen a single video from the first public technical rehearsal.
Oh please. I can handle opinions, but I don't enjoy people acting like Disney is superior to Universal because Disney doesn't do "screenz" when the most praised ride at Shanghai Disneyland right now uses just as many "screenz."
Sure about that? Pretty sure Tower of Terror would rank much higherThe most praised ride in the entire WDW resort is just a screen. (Soarin)
Sure about that? Pretty sure Tower of Terror would rank much higher
We differ in opinion thenIt doesn't.
Tot is much better. Soarin is like TSM, their popularity says more about the flaws of their parks than the rides themselves. They're not near as popular in other parks.It doesn't.
If projection screens are such an issue... Neither Disney or Universal will be impressing anyone over the next few years.I'm definately not saying it isn't, but over half of the comments are along the lines of "Another Universal simulator, yawn" or "Too many screenz!" and they're acting like Disney never does screens and has no fault and whatever.
Also, I reeeally think we need to slow down with our judgement of the ride. I'd give the ride a good month or so before we start deciding if this ride is a success or failure, good or bad, general resort ranking, etc. As it stands, most of us haven't ridden it and have only seen a single video from the first public technical rehearsal.
Exactly! I'm not gonna act like screen attractions won't ever get overdone in the future, but it's pretty much impossible to avoid them nowadays, like it or not, from either company.If projection screens are such an issue... Neither Disney or Universal will be impressing anyone over the next few years.
If projection screens are such an issue... Neither Disney or Universal will be impressing anyone over the next few years.
AMENCan we please stop bringing Disney into every conversation about Universal? I don't know any of the people on this board who are these mythical, dreaded "hypocritical Disney fans." If any of you want to rail against those people, take it to a place where they actually exist instead of cutting them down, straw man-style, in a forum where they can't argue back. I'm also getting weary of the the idea that anybody with criticism of Universal must be some brain-dead fan of Disney who engages in double standards.
For the record, I'm a Disney fan. I'm a Universal fan. It is possible to love both.
Sorry for the harsh tone, but this really irritates me. I'm beginning to understand how those who are tired of the screens debate must feel!