After reading this forum I noticed Oz was brought up. Disney doesn't own anything Oz besides their crappy "Oz the Great and Powerful" and "Return to Oz" both of which are based on the novels. Yes, Oz the Great and Powerful has the classic movie elements like the green witch that's not really protected by copyright anyone can have a green witch. But the ruby slippers and the music is. Warner Bros owns The Wizard of Oz and I can see them letting Universal do something with it for a park. Harry Potter and Scooby-Doo are both Warner Bros so it wouldn't surprise me. I think the Oz franchise has a wide appeal if they tie in Wicked. Wicked could have a full or short show like Japan, they still have the sets for it. It's been rumoured for a while that Wicked may have a presence in Citywalk. The movie elements will attract adults while the musical will bring in teens, like Harry Potter. It would definitely have to be a big area of the park to include everything such as Kansas, Munchkinland, Emerald City, and the Witches Castle. The key for making Oz work is the 1939 movie, without that, no one will want to go there. They want to feel as if they stepped into the movie. Also, the character meet and greets would work well. You could walk down the yellow brick road and meet the Scarecrow, Tin Man, and the Cowardly Lion, and maybe the Wicked Witch. You would have a tornado ride like forbidden journey, a dark ride in Munchkinland like It's a small world, a Journey through Oz ride, like Fallon or Simpsons, a flying monkey coaster, and a river rapids ride around the Witches castle. Kansas could have carnival area and maybe even a main street type feel. There are so many possibilities. I think if they got Harry Potter they can get Wizard of Oz. Wizard of Oz could really hurt Disney because it would be like the Magic Kingdom but immersive. Ok, I'm done dreaming.