Not a personal attack on anyone but what makes 1 source more reliable than another?
Who is to say who actually has a source and also a source that's actually credible?
I see a lot of "you guys are over thinking this, just wait and see
" kind of posts on here from people claiming they know more than they do.... So it only makes it harder to really gage what's actually what.
Just saying that your source is more reliable, or trying to discredit other people isn't really beneficial when no one actually knows who's telling the truth. It's a message board... It's all just speculation until proven true.
Who's to say one of us isn't an actual insider who works for UC... but also who's to say we aren't all full of shizz!