belloq87
Platinum Member
Question for any insiders that may be able to answer, does Universal themselves see their older properties as still valuable? It was a shock on my recent trip to see more merch for Back to the Future and Jaws than anything besides Potter and Jurassic Park. Do you think this is just to grab a quick buck or are they willing at all to re-introduce some of these IPs as full attractions?
With the Simpsons contract end date coming up in a couple of years and San Francisco having a notoriously horrible attraction, it seems these areas are practically begging to be rethemed to Hill Valley and Amity respectively, and they would fit in with Universal's push for lands themed to a single IP while not being too extensive overhauls. San Fran already has some seaside theming and Springfield's exteriors are pretty basic.
All indications are that Universal is happy to sell merchandise based on their classic IP, but have no plans to ever do anything with them within the parks again.
The Monsters land in Epic Universe is likely the closest thing we will ever get to Universal fully embracing an older property.
I'd love to be wrong.