I'm not one to comment on movies very often, but I was just reading the Washington Post's review of The Grinch, and I found the review answering many of the comments I've seen on this thread. Here's a few quotes from the review by Pat Padua...Title: Clever art direction turns new animated "Grinch" into early Christmas gift........"It just so happens that the new animated version of the Dr. Seuss classic "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" is a welcome, if early Christmas gift. You'd have to be a Scrooge to resist it. ....Working from a script by Michael LeSieur and Tommy Swerdlow, directors Yarrow Cheyney and Scott Mosier stay close to the tone of the 1966 TV special based on Dr. Seuss' book, even as they take liberties with back story and character development......With its charming character animation and innovative art direction, "The Grinch" is a vast improvement over Ron Howard's live-action adaptation of the same story. That garish 2000 film , which starred Jim Carrey as "The Grinch", looked like the cat that ate German Expressionism, the paintings of Thomas Kinkaid and the Target Holiday isle, and then threw up a 100 minute hairball. Compared with that travesty, this new"Grinch" is "Citizen Kane"......This endearing update of a holiday classic reminds us that the Christmas season can be hard for the lonely. It offers up an optimistic message that the Grinches of the world might melt their hard hearts if we meet them face to face-not with rancor, but with love".