I am still ricocheting off the walls at Andy's theories. I think I dreamt about it last night. The possibility that the writers hit us with 30 years at the same time is a vast conceit. If true, then oh to be so sharp. And that's a compliment.
Saw it, great show.For people who love this show, check out Dollhouse on Netflix. Unbelievably similar. Created by Joss Whedon (Buffy, Firefly, both Avengers movies)
Arguing the theories given in previous spoilers, why aren't the characters more clickety clackety if it was/is 30 years prior? None of them move like the old bill character at all. I await your explanation.
We don't actually know how old the park is though. We know Anthony Hopkins is 78- so his character is likely 75-80 or so. The park conceivably could have opened 50 years ago- that puts him at 30.That is my issue with the theory. There are too many similarities. Like with Dolores old father they mentioned like 4 different positions he had previously. Over 30 years I would doubt that 90% plus of the people we see are the same. They have filmed it in a way that they can get away with it but it would leave plotholes of everything looking too samey and the tech looking stagnant when they have already proven it has advanced leaps and bounds. At least this will all be answered once they cut back to Dolores and Will next week.
This is something that has been getting me a ton. Where the heck is this place. Its like a 100 story building or so. Likely underground, as there are no windows. We know that the "map" they look at is a 3D digital mapping of what is actually happening. I used to think the "old" westworld was physical, but the "new" westworld is digital; i.e.- they're plugged in- which fixes the bullet issue, whatever "critical failure" there was, and prevents harm from guests to other guests (or even guests falling off a cliff)- but that doesn't make sense as the security guard and lady physically go in westworld to fix the "milk" gunman and the "constellation" guy. It also takes them all day to reach him, and they physically need his head- so it's clearly still the "real" world.The park is somewhere unknown. Some think it is not on earth. In an interview Nolan said if you pay attention you should figure it out by the end of the season but the lady showrunner disagreed with him. So if we do find out it will be very subtle or implied.
And I'm not even upset and it doesn't feel "spoiler"- In fact, I'd prefer it- because if it is true- then we get to have a character we truly care about and to be able to see the entire event of "critical failure" instead of some lame, single "flashback" episode that doesn't hold nearly the weight or character development that this method does.I am still ricocheting off the walls at Andy's theories. I think I dreamt about it last night. The possibility that the writers hit us with 30 years at the same time is a vast conceit. If true, then oh to be so sharp. And that's a compliment.
This is something that has been getting me a ton. Where the heck is this place. Its like a 100 story building or so. Likely underground, as there are no windows. We know that the "map" they look at is a 3D digital mapping of what is actually happening. I used to think the "old" westworld was physical, but the "new" westworld is digital; i.e.- they're plugged in- which fixes the bullet issue, whatever "critical failure" there was, and prevents harm from guests to other guests (or even guests falling off a cliff)- but that doesn't make sense as the security guard and lady physically go in westworld to fix the "milk" gunman and the "constellation" guy- so it's clearly still the "real" world.
I've been kind of wondering if this corporation just purchased a huge chunk of Monument Valley or whatever and cordoned it off for their park. The control center was depicted as on top of a mesa in the first episode, with many sublevels underneath it (probably where the guest reception facility is, too) that connect to vast tunnels (utilidors!) built across the whole park.
There might not be any guarantee that you can't get hurt at all, I think they've only emphasized that the hosts can't hurt you. You probably have to sign a waiver or something beforehand.
Has anyone else noticed the escalators freaking everywhere? I've been wondering what the significance of that is.
Which leads me to a few questions-
What makes a guest not kill or rape another guest (and how would you even know WHO is a guest)?
What prevents you from falling in a raveen and busting your head open and bleeding to death (as it would take a medical team hours to get to you as we saw from the security guard and tech)?
If my timeline theory is correct, they could have used Logan's DNA from his semen left behind (from multiple people) to make Hector (in accordance with their terms and services). If that is not how the hosts are constructed, they still could have used his likeness for Hector as well.
Yes- that's reaching, but who knows with this bunch...
Hah- right?Is it two different actors?
There's nothing that ties William to being the MiB outside of MiB saying he was "born" in Westworld symbolizing a "rebirth" or departure from his old way (white to black) as well as them both picking the can up for Delores. But it could also be Logan, it just wouldn't seem as poetic. I 100% believe William and Logan are in a different timeline- and I have yet to hear any compelling evidence why they wouldn't. Again, the logo differences stand on their own. That was intentional for a reason. And I'm 95% sure William is the MiB.Aaaah... I never knew that the Ed Harris character is actually playing a character named "Man In Black". He has no other name on IMDB. The possibility that they are hiding that his true name is William becomes more compelling. Oooooooh!
Or a tumbleweed. Hah. Yet they say "the following deaths have occurred". Here's hoping we see that one...How do you accidentally die from self-cannibalism???
How do you accidentally die from self-cannibalism???
Or a tumbleweed. Hah. Yet they say "the following deaths have occurred". Here's hoping we see that one...
Teebin's dream TV series: "Westworld Meets Game of Thrones" :hail:
So, one thing that is unclear to me is violence beyond guns. Can a guest walk up to any of the hosts and tackle them to the ground? Do the hosts fight back and punch the guest in the face? If a guy bumped Teddy out of the way and grabbed Delores and dragged her into a shed... what would happen? I didn't read all of those Terms so perhaps there are rules.
The whole thing is such a strange concept.
I'vebeen thinking this as well. Something that was touched upon in the latest episode is that only certain hosts can use the axe and I assume other items that could be used as a weapon.