Wicked experiences coming to USH | Page 3 | Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
Inside Universal Forums
  • Home
  • Forums
    New posts Search forums Account Upgrades
  • News
    Universal Studios Hollywood Universal Orlando Universal Studios Japan Universal Studios Singapore Universal Studios Beijing
  • Merchandise
Log in Register
What's new Search

Search

By:
  • New posts
  • Search forums
  • Account Upgrades
Menu
Log in

Register

Install the app
  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Studios Hollywood
  • Upper Lot/Entertainment Center
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

Wicked experiences coming to USH

  • Thread starter Thread starter saint.piss
  • Start date Start date Sep 10, 2024
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5

Go to page

Next Last
Brian G.

Brian G.

Editor-in-Chief
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
27,329
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #41
Jerroddragon said:
I mean people saying "low effect Wicked redesign and street show wont work"

I'll point to Disney, People LOVE big hero six mini land, no rides and its all food and vibes and people love it, secondly Storytime with Deadpool lets not pretend this is big effort show and people love it

Also for those like it takes time....I've been here for years they have had time to plan every year they don't move the Tram just makes the project cost more and since we all know one day its going to happen all they are doing in delaying it is making it where it will cost the parks more later because inflation.

Anyway, I find it funny some are fighting against the Dreamworks theater not getting a new show after....8 years when the idea for this attraction was for it to be a flex space and get more shows....of course it won't be free to update it but it also won;t cost anything close to the coaster, SNW or even SLOP. It will cost much much less then any of those mostly it would be making a new movie and pre show and maybe new items in the case in the pre show.

Also on people saying I'm wrong on SNW crowds dying, I'm sorry the line for the line has gone wayyyyyy down and the land you can just walk into now...I go to the parks all the time the parks are not are crowded as a year ago. HHN this year was also lighter and while USH is has grinchmas that has days it closes at 6 PM...Disneyland fans are complaining about how busy the parks are right now...so there are easy factors to look at and see the park another SNW or two so it can stay open later then 6 PM on weekdays and have sold out days. I see that as a healthy park

But yeah in the end, I have low exceptions for the park because USH just doesn't want to be bigger, its not that it can't but as other pointed out in Hollywood we can't even get Wicked Meet and greets. People saying it would be too popular? But also we should wait years before adding anything Wicked to the park....ok I guess that makes sense somehow.

But I wish someone was in charge who saw their new hot movies and IPs and USED them. Have an area that every year becomes a new movie.....we all know a FNAF meet and greet would have been huge and nothing and now Wicked...they knew this would be huge and if they didn't then they wow. But Universal is fine with people waiting 3 hours for the Grinch, why not for Glinda and Elphaba?

Anyway Cowmissing on Reddit is making it sound like they might start pushing the park to get bigger...but you guys here keep me grounded and now it will be years before anything happens and part of it I get...Epic, HHN in Vegas and the Texas part have drained the bank for USH to grow until after the LA olymic's
Click to expand...

Seriously... enough!!!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: ethanuniversal, malice, HHN Maddux and 6 others
Freak

Freak

Time Traveler
Joined
Jan 10, 2013
Messages
8,479
Location
No man's land: SoCal
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #42
Dude, why do the Jerrod rants always happen on the most random threads that I never pay attention to? Why???? Why must I keep missing them????

Much to the chagrin of the mods, I’m gonna add my two cents here. If you’re complaining about USH not caring about the park since SNW, they’re building a giant freaking roller coaster right here in the park (That will make many thoosies’ too 10 lists mind you) and they started RIGHT AFTER SNW OPENED. To have this open three years (If not possibly less!) after opening a major new land is pretty good to me!

As for Wicked….It’s not really my thing, but if they can make an awesome new attraction or land out of it that would match Potter levels of quality, then I say bring it!
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: highdefrex, mccgavin, ParkExplorer9513 and 4 others
Clive

Clive

Dragon Trainer
Staff Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
7,002
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #43
Jerroddragon said:
I mean people saying "low effect Wicked redesign and street show wont work"

I'll point to Disney, People LOVE big hero six mini land, no rides and its all food and vibes and people love it, secondly Storytime with Deadpool lets not pretend this is big effort show and people love it

Also for those like it takes time....I've been here for years they have had time to plan every year they don't move the Tram just makes the project cost more and since we all know one day its going to happen all they are doing in delaying it is making it where it will cost the parks more later because inflation.

Anyway, I find it funny some are fighting against the Dreamworks theater not getting a new show after....8 years when the idea for this attraction was for it to be a flex space and get more shows....of course it won't be free to update it but it also won;t cost anything close to the coaster, SNW or even SLOP. It will cost much much less then any of those mostly it would be making a new movie and pre show and maybe new items in the case in the pre show.

Also on people saying I'm wrong on SNW crowds dying, I'm sorry the line for the line has gone wayyyyyy down and the land you can just walk into now...I go to the parks all the time the parks are not are crowded as a year ago. HHN this year was also lighter and while USH is has grinchmas that has days it closes at 6 PM...Disneyland fans are complaining about how busy the parks are right now...so there are easy factors to look at and see the park another SNW or two so it can stay open later then 6 PM on weekdays and have sold out days. I see that as a healthy park

But yeah in the end, I have low exceptions for the park because USH just doesn't want to be bigger, its not that it can't but as other pointed out in Hollywood we can't even get Wicked Meet and greets. People saying it would be too popular? But also we should wait years before adding anything Wicked to the park....ok I guess that makes sense somehow.

But I wish someone was in charge who saw their new hot movies and IPs and USED them. Have an area that every year becomes a new movie.....we all know a FNAF meet and greet would have been huge and nothing and now Wicked...they knew this would be huge and if they didn't then they wow. But Universal is fine with people waiting 3 hours for the Grinch, why not for Glinda and Elphaba?

Anyway Cowmissing on Reddit is making it sound like they might start pushing the park to get bigger...but you guys here keep me grounded and now it will be years before anything happens and part of it I get...Epic, HHN in Vegas and the Texas part have drained the bank for USH to grow until after the LA olymic's
Click to expand...

Alright man, go ahead and apply to be the head of Universal Studios Hollywood and run the park your way. We'll see how it goes.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: highdefrex, mccgavin, Jake S and 3 others
saint.piss

saint.piss

Dragon Trainer
Joined
Dec 29, 2022
Messages
6,563
Age
24
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #44
@Jerroddragon isn't perfect but he's very passionate about the parks and I think that's nice. He cares and that counts for something I guess lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: melodrama, belloq87, bdubsCEO and 3 others
Jake S

Jake S

Webslinger
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2023
Messages
3,449
Age
33
Location
california
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #45
I promise you can care about something without rigidly defining how it should exist
 
  • Like
Reactions: imagin78, Legacy, malice and 5 others
Brian G.

Brian G.

Editor-in-Chief
Staff Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2008
Messages
27,329
Location
Orlando, FL
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #46
Jake S said:
I promise you can care about something without rigidly defining how it should exist
Click to expand...
And to add, have a conversation about the difference of opinion instead of regurgitating the same tantrum over and over.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: Legacy, Rideguy70, highdefrex and 5 others
viking_wizard_eyes

viking_wizard_eyes

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Messages
1,216
Location
L.A.
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #47
Clive said:
Universal Studios Hollywood is not a locals park. It is a tourist park.
Click to expand...
Just to push back teeny bit here, and this is somewhat in Jerrod's defense, but I don't think this is reality quite yet. IMO, you couldn't categorize USH as a tourist park prior to the Wizarding World opening, which, in the grand scheme of things, wasn't that long ago. Even then, it was for tourists west of the Rockies for whom flying to Orlando was prohibitive, for whatever reason. I think SNW, a huge new coaster, and potentially a hotel are all clear signals that USH is moving toward becoming a tourist park, but even with SNW open, I don't think it's quite there. We're in a weird limbo.

And I think that's where the frustration for people sets in, where they see these moves toward becoming a tourist park and want to see some acceleration. But this, of course, ignores the unique complications that face USH, and not just the fact that it shares acreage with a working film studio, but also the unique logistics and bureaucracy that comes with existing within Los Angeles County that occasionally make even re-skinning something in the park complicated. (There's a good reason Walt Disney eventually opted to not put Disneyland in Burbank on the same property as his studio.)

I think people who are eager to see USH turn into a multi-day experience need to accept that it will take time, and may not even be possible for a variety of reasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: melodrama, ParkExplorer9513, Freak and 2 others
Jake S

Jake S

Webslinger
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2023
Messages
3,449
Age
33
Location
california
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #48
viking_wizard_eyes said:
Just to push back teeny bit here, and this is somewhat in Jerrod's defense, but I don't think this is reality quite yet.
Click to expand...
I think you have it completely backwards. It’s always been a tourists park and is now (imo) slowly becoming more of a locals park. The park is completely founded upon the studio tour — which is something that tourists have often made part of their LA vacation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: imagin78, malice, Jonathan and 3 others
viking_wizard_eyes

viking_wizard_eyes

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Messages
1,216
Location
L.A.
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #49
Jake S said:
I think you have it completely backwards. It’s always been a tourists park and is now (imo) slowly becoming more of a locals park. The park is completely founded upon the studio tour — which is something that tourists have often made part of their LA vacation.
Click to expand...
I don’t believe I do. I think your characterization of tourist and local is what’s backwards (due respect).

A “tourist” park is a place people visit expressly, meaning they go there to do that and that alone. I’ve been to Orlando probably close to if not over a dozen times at this point. I’ve never gone to visit Orlando. I’ve only gone visit the parks.

Tourists absolutely make the Studio Tour — and consequently USH — part of their LA vacation, but just a part of it. It’s often lumped in with stops at Griffith Observatory and the Santa Monica Pier and the Walk of Fame and the other LA sites. I would guess many of these tourists are there for a day, two at the most. Meanwhile, lots of locals (like myself) tend to visit the park multiple times per month, if not week.

Disneyland obviously has thousands of locals who visit multiple times per week or month, but the tourists going there are just there to do Disneyland. Most aren’t leaving their hotels, let alone making a trip up the 5. (Remember, this was essentially the entire creative concept behind DCA.) The reason is because the sheer scope of it requires more than one day.

I think people want to see USH have that kind of scope — they want USH to be the kind of park that’s a legitimate tourist destination not just one stop on a tourist’s itinerary. I think those people are pretty misguided on what kind of park USH can be, but I can nevertheless see it as a point of view.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ParkExplorer9513, Freak, saint.piss and 1 other person
Jake S

Jake S

Webslinger
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2023
Messages
3,449
Age
33
Location
california
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #50
The Eiffel Tower is a tourist destination in Paris. It's not the only reason people go to Paris. I don't understand why Universal Studios being a "stop" for tourists precludes it from being a tourists park anymore than Hollywood and Highland is a tourist trap even though it's not the only reason people visit Hollywood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michael S
Clive

Clive

Dragon Trainer
Staff Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
7,002
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #51
viking_wizard_eyes said:
I don’t believe I do. I think your characterization of tourist and local is what’s backwards (due respect).

A “tourist” park is a place people visit expressly, meaning they go there to do that and that alone. I’ve been to Orlando probably close to if not over a dozen times at this point. I’ve never gone to visit Orlando. I’ve only gone visit the parks.

Tourists absolutely make the Studio Tour — and consequently USH — part of their LA vacation, but just a part of it. It’s often lumped in with stops at Griffith Observatory and the Santa Monica Pier and the Walk of Fame and the other LA sites. I would guess many of these tourists are there for a day, two at the most. Meanwhile, lots of locals (like myself) tend to visit the park multiple times per month, if not week.

Disneyland obviously has thousands of locals who visit multiple times per week or month, but the tourists going there are just there to do Disneyland. Most aren’t leaving their hotels, let alone making a trip up the 5. (Remember, this was essentially the entire creative concept behind DCA.) The reason is because the sheer scope of it requires more than one day.

I think people want to see USH have that kind of scope — they want USH to be the kind of park that’s a legitimate *tourist destination*, not just one stop on a tourist’s itinerary. I think those people are pretty misguided on what kind of park USH can be, but I can nevertheless see it as a point of view.
Click to expand...

Respectfully, you are off base here. I strongly disagree with your definition of what a tourist park is. A tourist park is one whose audience is primarily made up of tourists. I obviously can't give out the actual numbers, but I have it on very good authority that Universal Studios Hollywood's #1 demographic - by a long shot - is foreign tourists.

I guess you could say that the park's primary target is "Los Angeles tourists" or "California tourists," but the result is the same -- they're tourists who travel out of their local environment to somewhere new to see the sights and visit attractions. Universal Studios Hollywood has been one of those points of interest, historically and undeniably.

Whether you go to "Orlando" vs "Walt Disney World" is missing the point -- or splitting hairs. You are a tourist who is traveling out of state. Walt Disney World primarily relies on visitors who live more than 100 miles away. The same is true of Universal Studios Hollywood.

I absolutely believe that Universal Studios Hollywood would love to expand its scope and become a destination that requires two or more days to experience, but that does not change the fact that is currently a tourist park. That could change following a radical transformation of the park/resort infrastructure alongside seismic shifts in travel trends (neither of which are impossible), but for now, the park is looking to attract tourists first, locals second.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Dog, Legacy, malice and 4 others
viking_wizard_eyes

viking_wizard_eyes

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Messages
1,216
Location
L.A.
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #52
Jake S said:
The Eiffel Tower is a tourist destination in Paris. It's not the only reason people go to Paris.
Click to expand...
I mean, I don’t wanna have a semantics debate, but Paris is the tourist destination, and the Eiffel Tour is part of the itinerary. Los Angeles is the tourist destination; the Studio Tour (USH) is a part of the itinerary.

Orlando is not a tourist destination; Walt Disney World is. Anaheim is not a tourist destination; Disneyland is. That’s the difference. People are visiting specifically for the parks.

Clive said:
Whether you go to "Orlando" vs "Walt Disney World" is missing the point -- or splitting hairs. You are a tourist who is traveling out of state. Walt Disney World primarily relies on visitors who live more than 100 miles away. The same is true of Universal Studios Hollywood.
Click to expand...
It’s not splitting hairs, for the reasons I stated above. I never denied USH gets a lot of tourists, and that many of them travel a long way to go. My point is about scope, and you kinda proved my point when you said the park would love to become a destination that requires more than two days at the absolute max — it would love to become a tourist destination in and of itself. It’s not there yet. It might not ever be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: saint.piss
Viator

Viator

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
23,385
Location
Seattle, WA!
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #53
Deleting as I am moving this to State of USH, as we are kind of dilluting the Wicked thread now with something Not-Wicked based xD
 
Last edited: Nov 22, 2024
KlownzNskullZ

KlownzNskullZ

Minion
Joined
Sep 5, 2018
Messages
880
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #54
Clive said:
Universal Studios Hollywood is not a locals park. It is a tourist park. You are treating it as a locals park, which it is not. Disneyland, which is a locals resort, is investing in its parks at about the same rate, give or take. (Yes, they made a bunch of splashy announcements, but they're many years away.)

Universal Studios Hollywood does run special events to appeal to locals -- Horror Nights, holidays, the 60th tram tour festivities, now FanFest, which is a USH exclusive! If you're expecting a new major attraction every year for this park, your expectations are just not realistic, sorry.
Click to expand...
Used to be a locals park. Pre potter
 
Clive

Clive

Dragon Trainer
Staff Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
7,002
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #55
viking_wizard_eyes said:
I mean, I don’t wanna have a semantics debate, but Paris is the tourist destination, and the Eiffel Tour is part of the itinerary. Los Angeles is the tourist destination; the Studio Tour (USH) is a part of the itinerary.

Orlando is not a tourist destination; Walt Disney World is. Anaheim is not a tourist destination; Disneyland is. That’s the difference. People are visiting specifically for the parks.

It’s not splitting hairs, for the reasons I stated above. I never denied USH gets a lot of tourists, and that many of them travel a long way to go. My point is about scope, and you kinda proved my point when you said the park would love to become a destination that requires more than two days at the absolute max — it would love to become a tourist destination in and of itself. It’s not there yet. It might not ever be.
Click to expand...

Orlando is a tourist destination. It is a town literally built and dependent on tourism! Walt Disney World is the largest tourist destination in Orlando. Universal Orlando is also a predominantly tourist-driven resort, though it has a larger proportion of locals in its audience mix (thanks in part for its local-friendly pricing structure -- or, put another way, cheaper price).

Two things can be true: Universal Studios Hollywood is primarily a tourist destination (and thus a tourist park), and it also hopes to be more than a one-day excursion someday. Based on what we can infer about their future plans, the short-term goal is to capture one to two night stays at an on-site hotel to collect revenue that's currently going to the nearby Hilton and Sheraton. The long-term goal is to build out the park and even, decades from now, explore a second gate to make the destination an actual resort worthy of multi-day stays by default (making the investment in the hotel a long-term boon).

Somewhere in there, the balance between tourists and locals could shift, but right now, it's predominantly tourists. USH was not a tourist park pre-Potter. I think some of you are too close to this and are engaging in confirmation bias. Like, I don't know how else to explain to you that I have been told repeatedly by folks with firsthand information that corporate and management view USH as a tourist-driven park.
 
Last edited: Nov 22, 2024
  • Like
Reactions: ParkExplorer9513, Jake S, rageofthegods and 1 other person
viking_wizard_eyes

viking_wizard_eyes

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Messages
1,216
Location
L.A.
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #56
Clive said:
Orlando is a tourist destination. It is a town literally built and dependent on tourism! Walt Disney World is the largest tourist destination in Orlando. Universal Orlando is also a predominantly tourist-driven resort, though it has a larger proportion of locals in its audience mix (thanks in part for its local-friendly pricing structure -- or, put another way, cheaper price).

Two things can be true: Universal Studios Hollywood is primarily a tourist destination (and thus a tourist park), and it also hopes to be more than a one-day excursion someday. Based on what we can infer about their future plans, the short-term goal is to capture one to two night stays at an on-site hotel to collect revenue that's currently going to the nearby Hilton and Sheraton. The long-term goal is to build out the park and even, decades from now, explore a second gate to make the destination an actual resort worthy of multi-day stays by default (making the investment in the hotel a long-term boon).

Somewhere in there, the balance between tourists and locals could shift, but right now, it's predominantly tourists. USH was not a tourist park pre-Potter. I think some of you are too close to this and are engaging in confirmation bias. Like, I don't know how else to explain to you that I have been told repeatedly by folks with firsthand information that corporate and management view USH as a tourist-driven park.
Click to expand...
Like I told Jake, it feels like you're just trying to argue semantics, especially the destination part of tourist destination. Either you're not getting what I'm saying or just completely ignoring it. (Not sure which because you called Orlando a tourist destination, and then said Walt Disney World is the largest tourist destination in Orlando . . . so either you're changing your characterization of tourist destination mid-sentence or this is some kinda Nolanesque game of destination-ception).

I think you're under the assumption that I don't think USH gets tourists, or that I think the majority of its visitors aren't tourists. I never said either thing. Los Angeles gets many, many foreign tourists every year, so obviously USH is going to have many, many tourists visit the park.

That, in and of itself, does not make USH a tourist park because those people are making USH one stop as part of their larger trip. If you know enough to know that the majority of visitors are foreign tourists, then you should also know that most of them are doing many other things while visiting LA. Even if you didn't know that firsthand, it's still logical conclusion to draw, because like you said, USH is at most a two-day visit.

You cannot say the same for Disney World, or Disneyland, or the Universal Orlando resort. The people visiting those tourist destinations, aka tourist parks, are making them their one and only stop. Orlando is not the draw; Anaheim is not the draw. The parks are the purpose for their visit. If your single criteria for a tourist park is "tourists visit," then every theme park is a tourist park.

USH is a locals park aspiring to be a tourist park and it's currently caught in limbo, and it's making people like Jerrod mad because they have Veruca Salt energy and they want the park to basically be Disneyland, even though it'll probably never be Disneyland even if/when it's able to finally call itself a tourist park. That's all I have left to say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: saint.piss
B

Banshee

Shark Bait
Joined
Jul 14, 2021
Messages
101
Age
29
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #57
I got a question: what has anything in the past few hours had to do with, let me check the title of this thread again, Wicked experiences coming to USH?
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: ParkExplorer9513, saint.piss and bdubsCEO
Jake S

Jake S

Webslinger
Staff Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2023
Messages
3,449
Age
33
Location
california
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #58
viking_wizard_eyes said:
That, in and of itself, does not make USH a tourist park because those people are making USH one stop as part of their larger trip.
Click to expand...
this is fundamentally where we disagree. the makeup of the park is majority tourist and I absolutely believe that makes it a tourist park, not a locals park.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mad Dog, Legacy and Clive
Michael S

Michael S

Minion
Staff Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2020
Messages
625
Age
28
Location
Torrance
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #59
IMG_8105.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HHN Maddux, ParkExplorer9513, Freak and 4 others
viking_wizard_eyes

viking_wizard_eyes

Jurassic Ranger
Joined
Apr 26, 2019
Messages
1,216
Location
L.A.
  • Nov 22, 2024
  • #60
Jake S said:
this is fundamentally where we disagree. the makeup of the park is majority tourist and I absolutely believe that makes it a tourist park, not a locals park.
Click to expand...
Then you need a new way to categorize Walt Disney World, because there is something categorically different about a tourist who pops into USH while on vacation in Los Angeles, and a tourist who goes to Orlando because they’re spending a week in Walt Disney World and Walt Disney World happens to be in Orlando.

That’s not splitting hairs. Those things are fundamentally not the same. And now I’m done.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 3 of 5

Go to page

Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.
Share:
Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link

Book with our Travel Partners

MEI Travel

Latest posts

  • Blysthon
    Halloween Horror Nights 34 (UOR) - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: Blysthon
    • 7 minutes ago
    Halloween Horror Nights 34
  • EllieB
    Universal Great Britain - Speculation & Rumors
    • Latest: EllieB
    • Today at 7:36 AM
    Other Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Eckert
    Harry Potter & The Battle at the Ministry - Reviews, Photos & Media
    • Latest: Eckert
    • Today at 7:34 AM
    Epic Universe Reviews
  • TheUniC6
    New Tomorrowland Rumored for DL
    • Latest: TheUniC6
    • Today at 4:11 AM
    Disneyland Resort
  • Rhian
    New Nickelodeon Hotel - Everest Place
    • Latest: Rhian
    • Today at 2:31 AM
    Orlando Area Hotels

Share this page

Facebook X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email Share Link
  • Forums
  • Universal Parks & Resorts
  • Universal Studios Hollywood
  • Upper Lot/Entertainment Center
  • Style variation
    System Light Dark
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
  • RSS
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2025 XenForo Ltd.
  • This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn more…
Back
Top