Grabnar
Platinum Member
- Aug 5, 2018
- 1,811
- 5,377
Population size + better testing...
Lot of epidemiologists in my feed begging the media to stop focusing on case counts... headlines like this disincentivize politicians from increasing testing capacity, when the truly important data points (percentage positive cases, hospitalizations) go buried...
Yeah, the lack of testing occurred to me after I posted. I couldn't find city-based numbers, but Texas as a whole has performed 1.6M tests for a population of 29M, and California has performed 3.5M tests for a population of 39.5 M. Texas is at 55.17 test/1000 people, and California is at 88.6/1000.
This is going to impact people way worse than 9/11 did economically. There is no immediate bounce back, even once there's a vaccine. With 9/11, it mostly just scared people off for a bit, but there wasn't a long-term economic impact for the most part. We bounced back relatively quick because people got over it. This is so much different because it's actually hitting the people HARD.
Write your representatives, U.S. people. This does not need to be as bad as the government is making it. Flat out. This is a conscious choice to put large corporations over the well-being of the population.