JoeCamel
V.I.P. Member
Late to this party, but wanted to chime in.
I could easily Universal and JK having a stand off about the dragon challenge area.
I would bet anything under the sun that Universal would vastly prefer something along the lines of a tame ride. There has clearly been a strong push/compromise to incorporate thrill rides with minimal height requirements that the entire family can ride regardless of age or height.
48" is a pretty massive height requirement. If you're lucky, you have a kid at 6 that can barely fit (like mine)- were tall. But most will be 8 or so. Same with 42"- you might have a 4 year old there but most will be 6. So those 4 and 5 year old kids- that are prime "wand" age- might not be attending the park until they are 6, 7, 8, etc. Or even worse- they wait until their youngest is tall enough. So that oldest kid might be 10, 11, 12.
Universal knows this. They know where their draw is. And they know that those 30-40 year old parents with young kids are dying to Instagram those kids donning their wands and robes.
JK is much more concerned with integrity versus universal capitalizing on younger families and that critical spending demographic.
So I could see Uni wanting a slow family ride while Jk wants something much more intense. I think we get something in the middle more like Kong. Obviously not that ride or tech but that idea- still very intense and "scary" but no height requirement.
I'd prefer something more intense with a decent height requirement (and my youngest is 3)- but I'd be surprised if they did.
The only way I see an expansion and the money spent on Their largest represented property is if they can make more money from it. And youngins are the key.
According to the way I read the survey I just did they really want a piece of that younger market. It started with a MK commercial :curse:!!
Either that or they are building a dossier on me. I haven't used my AP since early December:look: