I wonder if they're floating a Kong rumor (in JP) just to see what kind of reaction it gets, and really could overlay/replace Disaster with Kong instead of just fixing up Disaster. That would make some sense...more sense than any of the latest rumors have lately.
They could possibly do a mix of 3d with animatronic kongs for the disaster building, like 3d on the way to the big show room at the end with a bunch of physical effects
I don't care where they put Kong....just put it in already.
They could possibly do a mix of 3d with animatronic kongs for the disaster building, like 3d on the way to the big show room at the end with a bunch of physical effects
Some thoughts: If (and thats a big if) USF were to import Kong from Hollywood to Orlando, it could not act as a stand alone attraction. It'd have to be lengthened dramatically. In addition, it would not thematically make sense in the Disaster Building. A journey through skull island in the middle of San Francisco wouldn't fly. Jurassic Park would make more sense in comparison (although it doesn't fit there either). In my opinion it is a unique attraction that I'd love to have, but the "too much 3D" mantra is a valid one. Hopefully some of their 3D attractions (Shrek and T2 come to mind) go under the knife in the next few years in order to reset the balance of the park.
That's what she said!
Sorry, couldn't help myself :rofl:
I'd love to see Kong back in USF, but I think they'd need a current Kong movie that was green lit to build a new attraction in UOR. Spiderman is my favorite theme park attraction and I'm sure TF will be awesome as well but I really need some AAs and practical tangible effects for a change of pace.
The kong section in california works well as its just part of the tour, would never work as a stand alone ride.
Would be an awsome start to a coaster, start off go through the tunnels then drop into the coaster ride trying to escape from Kong
King Kong themed hyper coaster ound: