There is still a Seuss project on the way down the line.
JP is just coming first.
Probably Lorax but I would prefer Mt. Crumpit no doubt.
There is still a Seuss project on the way down the line.
JP is just coming first.
Probably Lorax but I would prefer Mt. Crumpit no doubt.
I would prefer it too, I think they would be able to do more with Mt Crumpit however I wonder if it would take the excitement away from Grinchmas.
I would prefer it too, I think they would be able to do more with Mt Crumpit however I wonder if it would take the excitement away from Grinchmas.
I don't see why it would.
Because it would be the same story, one in show format and the other in ride format.
I also think they will do Lorax because its more of a newer film than The Grinch. And because a lot of the riders at Suess Landings is children and they may have been more likely to have watched lorax rather than The Grinch.
True that Lorax is popular with kids today, but not insanely popular. The movie didn't do amazing, and the further we get from it the less kids will know what it is. If they were to go Lorax I would hope it would be very heavily book driven not movie driven.
Lorax has been scrapped from my understanding. Any movement in Suess going forward depends on Illumination's take on the Grinch
Which is smart because the Grinch is definitely Seuss' most iconic character other than Cat in the Hat.Lorax has been scrapped from my understanding. Any movement in Suess going forward depends on Illumination's take on the Grinch
This is totally off topic, but while I agree with you, and i'm not pointing out you in particular skip, but when people start talking if a movie is a success or not based on box office numbers, I just laugh. You say it's nothing to scoff at, and it certainly isn't. At the same time, you'll get a group of people who'll call Tron: Legacy a bust in the states, even though it made the same amount of money. Movies can't be judged solely on box office success.The Lorax was pretty big in the states. 200+ million is nothing to scoff at for a Dr. Seuss movie.
This is totally off topic, but while I agree with you, and i'm not pointing out you in particular skip, but when people start talking if a movie is a success or not based on box office numbers, I just laugh. You say it's nothing to scoff at, and it certainly isn't. At the same time, you'll get a group of people who'll call Tron: Legacy a bust in the states, even though it made the same amount of money. Movies can't be judged solely on box office success.
It made enough over seas to be profitable. The Daft Punk soundtrack continues to get used to this day during various TV events, etc. It's image also inspired part of the Black Eyed Peas Half-time show at the Super Bowl.Well, TRON: Legacy also cost significantly more than Lorax to make. So it's not necessarily a 1:1 comparison.
This is totally off topic, but while I agree with you, and i'm not pointing out you in particular skip, but when people start talking if a movie is a success or not based on box office numbers, I just laugh. You say it's nothing to scoff at, and it certainly isn't. At the same time, you'll get a group of people who'll call Tron: Legacy a bust in the states, even though it made the same amount of money. Movies can't be judged solely on box office success.
Well, TRON: Legacy also cost significantly more than Lorax to make. So it's not necessarily a 1:1 comparison.
It made enough over seas to be profitable. The Daft Punk soundtrack continues to get used to this day during various TV events, etc. It's image also inspired part of the Black Eyed Peas Half-time show at the Super Bowl.
tbh, i'm not sure what my point is either. :blank:I'm not sure what your point is. The soundtrack and aesthetics were the best part of the movie. But it wasn't a film that audiences really latched onto outside of that.
Also, it only made 172 million in the US.
The Lorax was pretty big in the states. 200+ million is nothing to scoff at for a Dr. Seuss movie.