Next Attraction To Go?

[kimlovesfl]

If we did Impact for 10 years, managing in-park and non-park guests, we could easily do the same with the Tonight Show. Tickets could be obtained in advance, or, given out day of taping if needed. It wouldn't be that hard to do, and we truly enjoyed having the Tonight Show in the park and hope they return.

 

[Skubersky]

Would that be 747?

Is this the same project # that Teebs previously alluded may be risqué?

I think you may be off by 10...

 

[Disneyhead]

BTW, The project number for this is a somewhat well-known/historic number dating from the 1960's-70's.

737

And I heard that this Fallon thing is "temporary", to be followed by an attraction based on an entirely different IP going in there.

 

[Parkscope Joe]

I think you may be off by 10...

All the puzzle pieces come together.

 

[TJwny]

737

And I heard that this Fallon thing is "temporary", to be followed by an attraction based on an entirely different IP going in there.

Hopefully less temporary than the hat at DHS!

 

[Teebin]

737

And I heard that this Fallon thing is "temporary", to be followed by an attraction based on an entirely different IP going in there.

Not unless my bird read the project number very incorrectly! As far as temporary, the DHS hat was temporary until it wasn't until years went by and it was. I will reserve judgement on this until what's done is done, fat lady sings etc.

And where did this flying Soarin knockoff thing come from? Mercy.

 

[martymcflyy85]

737

And I heard that this Fallon thing is "temporary", to be followed by an attraction based on an entirely different IP going in there.

Oh thank goodness!

 

[Teebin]

Ok, now I am completely and utterly vexed regarding twister... (please know that when it comes to this site, I love being vexed)

First, what I reported as outrageous turns out to have been a misunderstanding. Someone was talking in tongues due to mixed company and it went right over my head.

That said, my musings about a tonight show studio still somewhat holds, but were shaken today by a common theme park attraction term being present amongst "things".

Finally, a keyword is throwing me for a loop as it can really be misinterpreted or rather, used in many ways.

Describe what the following pictures are for you in one word. One word for all of the pics combined.

 

[OrlandoGuy]

Stadium-style simulator using IMAX screens, a 3-D video that has to do with flying, with the theme of a live studio show....

Hm

If that's really it, I'm kinda bummed to see Twister go for it. But oh well.

 

[Teebin]

Stadium-style simulator using IMAX screens, a 3-D video that has to do with flying, with the theme of a live studio show....

Hm

If that's really it, I'm kinda bummed to see Twister go for it. But oh well.

I was looking for one word to describe all pictures. One word only please.

 

[Jwhee]

My guess! So if all these attractions had a baby i would describe it as
"Kick-A$$"
I guess we can consider that one word

 

[Skubersky]

Theaters?

 

[Teebin]

Theaters?

yes! yet singular. This is why I am vexed. Where is one to go with that especially when a theme park attraction term follows the word.

 

[martymcflyy85]

stationary?

 

[Teebin]

stationary?

Sorta kinda... but not really, yet it does always happen after a certain button is pressed.

 

[sjago13]

Rotating?

 

[Cole]

Interactive!!!

 

[Mad Dog]

Movement?

 

[Teebin]

oh dear, I blame myself. What is it called when a ride goes "stationary" after a button is pushed.

 

[kgri2]

At Universal that's called an e-stop.