1. Welcome to the Inside Universal Forums! Make sure to sign up and join the community! It's fast, free, and easy! DO IT!

Sony/Marvel Spider-Man Deal

Discussion in 'Games, Movies & Sports' started by quinnmac000, Aug 20, 2019.

  1. Ryan

    Ryan Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    May 23, 2013
    Messages:
    4,375
    Likes Received:
    6,288
    If Sony indeed came back with counter-offers and Disney refused, that's a different story. However, at the same time I don't consider Sony an "underdog" against "big bad Disney". I earnestly think that some are letting their emotions towards loyalty in the fandom get in the way of viewing the bigger picture: this is two corporations have a very public and unfortunate spat that's essentially a game of chicken. Both are wealthy corporations, yet at the same time I don't think a separate arrangement is good for either studio. Spider-Verse is a miracle birthed out of SPA, not from Sony's much more problematic live-action division.

    On the same side of the coin, I think Disney is also getting too demanding if they were unwilling to hear another offer. I don't think the polarizing discourse of "screw Sony!" or "screw Disney!" is adding anything to these negotiations as it's very clear that's exactly what each company wants. Granted, the dial is more on the Sony side because most people remember that live-action Spidey has not done well in 15 years outside of the MCU. Yet gnashing one's teeth over Disney doesn't really solve things... it only worsens the discourse.

    I see frustration coming out @Joe and others, and I get where that's coming from but I'd rather look at the situation from a 10,000ft view (and this is coming after a couple days to sleep on it, if anybody wants to cherry pick)... I look towards James Gunn which spent, how long... a year? In "most definitely never" territory only to be reversed. The corporations WANT you to think this is a done deal, because that'll help sway how negotiations will go. Until the first live-action Spidey goes into production without Feige onboard, I don't believe it's over for now.

    True, but let's also not forget that a large amount of that is audience demand. You can talk about how Disney has been bullying theaters about the first runs, but that still does not account for the massively low turnout for other films.
     
    HereWeGo and MrBlonde like this.
  2. MrBlonde

    MrBlonde Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2018
    Messages:
    217
    Likes Received:
    409
    I’m pretty sure that all of the leaking of this situation is done on Sony’s part to get the public outcry. Disney never seems to have made official comments besides Feige is busy.

    Re: the size-Disney by market cap is almost 4x as big but that’s also determined by their sheer dominance of their content vs their competitors, but it’s still a millionaires’ pillow fight with piles of money.

    Both sides can make more money together than they will apart, but Sony doesn’t have a cohesive vision so the fact that Disney wants control over anything they have the right to use freaks them out because it limits their options rather than thinking about how integrated they can be.

    If I were them, I’d make a deal and every time a character they have the rights to is used in a Disney made film, they get a % of the box office according to their importance to the storyline. (I.e. a Dark Avengers with Norman Osborn leading the team would be significant vs a Civil War-sized cameo of Spider-Man.)
     
    allaboutthatchase and Ryan like this.
  3. Paulio

    Paulio Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    415
    Location:
    Northern California
  4. Mad Dog

    Mad Dog Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Messages:
    16,528
    Likes Received:
    25,520
    Location:
    Pittsburgh area
    Sad to hear that. Supposedly Stan's last years were pretty tough anyway as he was prodded into too many appearances for a man his age, to try to make up for a few past bad financial decisions. As one who was reading Stan's comics from FF first appearance onward, and has over 4000 Marvel comics (most from 60's and 70's), Marvel and Disney should have treated him better, both as the creative life behind most of the A list characters, and financially. Hell, out of the billions they were making they surely could have given him enough to live comfortably off of, instead of having to drag himself into appearances in his old age to try to make a living. Shame on Marvel/Disney. ....Damn, this is a bad week for Disney's rep.
     
  5. Paulio

    Paulio Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    415
    Location:
    Northern California
    Unfortunately even worse, after this news came out, many Disney fanboys on the internet provided damage control by accusing Stan Lee's daughter of abusing her father where none really exists. It just makes them look really bad on their part.
     
  6. Mad Dog

    Mad Dog Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Messages:
    16,528
    Likes Received:
    25,520
    Location:
    Pittsburgh area
    Now we're no longer sure if those are fan boys or Disney social media plants, after the Mice Chat 'possible' scandal came out earlier this week.
     
  7. Freak

    Freak Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    3,645
    Likes Received:
    4,653
    Location:
    No man's land: SoCal
    *tin foil hat time*

    With this happening, it makes Disney cooking the books far more believable and...dare I say it...Disney buying out Capt Marvel slots seem far more believable with all of that backlash. (Say what you want about that, but when they used Stan Lee’s PERSONAL Twitter account to promote it, that wouldn’t surprise me). Disney has been so shady lately nothing would surprise me anymore. Really disgusting how they treated Stan’s daughter.

    There’s clearly fault on both ends (Sony and Disney) and I hope negotiations will keep going.
     
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2019
    allaboutthatchase and Mad Dog like this.
  8. Paulio

    Paulio Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    415
    Location:
    Northern California
  9. Cup_Of_Coffee

    Cup_Of_Coffee Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2018
    Messages:
    1,048
    Likes Received:
    1,182
    MrBlonde and allaboutthatchase like this.
  10. Paulio

    Paulio Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    415
    Location:
    Northern California
    If anything, it might lead us down the route of the Maximum Carnage movie and potentially being R-rated and horror. Besides, we never had a known, commercially and critically successful horror R-rated superhero movie before.
     
    SeventyOne likes this.
  11. tyro

    tyro Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2016
    Messages:
    132
    Likes Received:
    158
    Location:
    Kansas
    Last edited: Aug 22, 2019
  12. Nick

    Nick Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    17,232
    Likes Received:
    23,970
    Location:
    Orlando
    They may have been unsure if Venom as a character would hit so they went safer with PG-13. Now that they know how well Venom did financially, going R-rated is a lot easier as you already are a known entity and don’t need to worry how people will respond to the character. People loved Hardy as Venom.
     
    Mad Dog likes this.
  13. Paulio

    Paulio Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    415
    Location:
    Northern California
    Tom Holland on Spider-Man's future following Disney-Sony rift | EW.com

    It looks like Tom Holland said during D23 backstage that Disney has no new plans to include Spider-Man in future MCU films and that future Spider-Man movies with Sony alone and without MCU will be different, as he's still in contract with Sony Pictures. There may be doubts whether Disney and Sony could team up again, but the future potential deal between Disney and Sony is pretty much non-existent due to the circumstances of both companies involved.
     
  14. quinnmac000

    quinnmac000 Veteran Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2014
    Messages:
    5,122
    Likes Received:
    5,227
    Location:
    Seoul, Korea
  15. Freak

    Freak Veteran Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    3,645
    Likes Received:
    4,653
    Location:
    No man's land: SoCal
    I will admit that I’m trying to cling to any small bit of hope that I can, but I refuse to believe they’ll just let this go. I’m sure they’re going to keep pursuing negotiations.
     
  16. Nick

    Nick Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    17,232
    Likes Received:
    23,970
    Location:
    Orlando
    That’s the ballgame, folks. I had hope they’d reach a deal, I really did. But when Supreme Leader Feige and Spider-Man both come out with solid statements like that, it’s over.

    (Unless Feige’s playing hard ball to basically say they don’t need Spider-Man in hopes that they’ll come back to the table)

    At least I have PS4’s Spider-Man sequel to look forward to. The PS4 Spider-Man game was the best Spidey story ever told on screen, after all.
     
  17. zg44

    zg44 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2017
    Messages:
    943
    Likes Received:
    1,682
    Yeah, I just don't see what kind of deal would work at this point. Disney doesn't want to give up precious MCU slots if they're not getting a significant portion of profit in exchange. They've got tons of characters like X-Men/FF to go through...

    Sony doesn't want to give up a significant portion of the profit.

    Sometimes, it's that simple. We got 5 Spiderman MCU films including 2 solo. Now I'd imagine Sony will try to do a separate Spiderman trilogy with Holland that will anchor a new "Spiderverse" with Venom/Morbius/Black Cat etc....
     
    Mad Dog and Nick like this.
  18. Nick

    Nick Staff Member Moderator

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    17,232
    Likes Received:
    23,970
    Location:
    Orlando
    I imagine he’ll be introduced to Sony’s Spider-verse through Venom 2. The pressure is certainly on Sony to make good Spider-Man movies though, that part is for sure.
     
    JM-BENT, zg44, HereWeGo and 1 other person like this.
  19. Mad Dog

    Mad Dog Premium Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2013
    Messages:
    16,528
    Likes Received:
    25,520
    Location:
    Pittsburgh area
    Yes. Most especially, Fantastic Four and it's related heroes and villains have been underused, and poorly used. FF was Marvel's flag ship, even more than Spidey, in the 60's and 70's. It's high sales, and spin off comics, kept the Marvel franchise going. X-Men has been pretty exposed, but there's still possibilities if the early movie quality returns.
     
  20. Paulio

    Paulio Member

    Joined:
    Apr 28, 2016
    Messages:
    921
    Likes Received:
    415
    Location:
    Northern California

Share This Page