- Nov 9, 2019
- 1,139
- 2,332
That's all I meant, nothing more then a mention xDI doubt anything gets announced. Although they will continue with the "We can't wait to open this in our Hollywood and Florida parks soon"
It's all about Japan tomorrow
That's all I meant, nothing more then a mention xDI doubt anything gets announced. Although they will continue with the "We can't wait to open this in our Hollywood and Florida parks soon"
It's all about Japan tomorrow
"Don't worry guys. We, too, like money,"I doubt anything gets announced. Although they will continue with the "We can't wait to open this in our Hollywood and Florida parks soon"
They built the new parade building because they needed more space for the daytime parade. They also wanted to expand rehearsal space for the parade cast since the rehearsal rooms in the Entertainment building are a touch small.I believe that's why they built the new parade building. Because the old one would have been where DK was supposed to go.
For the record, I would not say they are having a hard time with it. From what I have heard, it may have gone through a few iterations in blue sky, but they got pretty far into development for a new ride based on Pokemon (and it's not the one we've heard about).Tbh, I think they're struggling on how to integrate Pokemon; it's not a lack of will as much the difficulty of adapting it to a park without coming across as chintzy. It would be easy to slap a theme on a bunch of flat rides and call it a day (Kang and Kodo comes to mind), but what would you do to make it feel fully fleshed out without it feeling like you're just cramming Pokemon into other rides?
Would you say it’s on the same par as SNW? I understand that may difficult to answer lol.For the record, I would not say they are having a hard time with it. From what I have heard, it may have gone through a few iterations in blue sky, but they got pretty far into development for a new ride based on Pokemon (and it's not the one we've heard about).
All I know is Pokemon received a lot more time and development than Zelda, which never made it out of blue sky.Would you say it’s on the same par as SNW? I understand that may difficult to answer lol.
I think the big thing is my guess, is they are very confident in the product they have with SNW. In a post Covid world we’ll see but regardless they are I think very thrilled with what they’ve done and this isn’t just my reaction to it all, prior to Covid they greenlit 4 iterations of this land along with an expansion to it, they’re happy from what I can see. If they don’t feel Pokemon is done as well I can see why in Orlando they’d rather just save the ride for USF, not that it’s any less, but it does seem like Nintendo was the anchor for EU, regardless of how great the Potter rides may be because Nintendo as an IP is new to the resort as a whole, bringing in a new crowd.
Idk if any of that made sense lol, but I really think they need to get this to Orlando for 2024/2025 if they can, I think operations will be more normalized by that point where it makes sense.
Makes sense too, Pokemon is much more a sure fire hit. The idea of Pokemon being around USF, like was mentioned in your video about Un-Built kidzone projects, seemed like such a great ides to rejuvenate that park a bit.All I know is Pokemon received a lot more time and development than Zelda, which never made it out of blue sky.
All I know is Pokemon received a lot more time and development than Zelda, which never made it out of blue sky.
I'll just respond with thisDoes Pokemon have identifiable places and aesthetics? I'm not into Pokemon at all. And while I'm not a huge Nintendo fan in general.....everyone is at least somewhat familiar with the world that Mario & Co. inhabit. Anyone have any pictures of places associated with Pokemon? If not....it already makes it a tough sell as a theme park land to the general public.
Kanto. And all they need is Pokemon to sell it to the general public. They didn't need it with Star Wars, and they don't need it here.Does Pokemon have identifiable places and aesthetics? I'm not into Pokemon at all. And while I'm not a huge Nintendo fan in general.....everyone is at least somewhat familiar with the world that Mario & Co. inhabit. Anyone have any pictures of places associated with Pokemon? If not....it already makes it a tough sell as a theme park land to the general public.
You know what? Imma say it. Cancel Fantastic Beasts and Classic Monsters, move their attractions over to the main two parks, and build Zelda and Pokemon here. Super Nintendo World on a wider scale with quality maintained throughout would get people through the gates easily, video game IP or otherwise.
Also, I don't get why they're sitting on Pokemon. It's a giant IP spanning across several mediums. It's already proven itself.