Because SNW was meant to be the anchor for EU to draw people in. You take that away, what other family friendly IPs could you have to anchor EU to draw people in? Not much.Easily a worse timeline for the resort as a whole.
Because SNW was meant to be the anchor for EU to draw people in. You take that away, what other family friendly IPs could you have to anchor EU to draw people in? Not much.Easily a worse timeline for the resort as a whole.
I do wonder if we'll see the facial recognition used actively in future rides? Imagine something ET saying your name but you never used the boarding pass, it just recognized you on sight. Which also sounds really creepy now that I write it out.
It's one of the biggest "What if...?" moments that I can think of in the park's history.A look into an alternate, better timeline for USF.
Only if you believe Epic wouldn't have been built without it.Easily a worse timeline for the resort as a whole.
I think you could have gone a couple of different ways. You could swap in one of the two rumored Nintendo lands slated for the existing parks: Pokemon and Zelda.Because SNW was meant to be the anchor for EU to draw people in. You take that away, what other family friendly IPs could you have to anchor EU to draw people in? Not much.
Considering all the good I think it would have instantly done for the park's attraction roster, this would have been easy to overlook.Giant plain walls around SNW wouldve stood out as weird in USF more than Epic.
Not really. Don't get me wrong, I'm excited for Epic, but I wish that Nintendo/Potter went into USF and that Isle of Berk went into IOA. Monsters is really the only land that wouldn't have happened at either of the other parks. Epic Universe is exciting but (hot take incoming) kinda unnecessary.Easily a worse timeline for the resort as a whole.
Unpopular opinion yes, but I've thought the same. I liked that small campus feel with everything within walking distance. I would have preferred the building up of the present two parks...But, I'm sure, we're in the minority by far.....Epic will certainly be an excellent park. But I'll still stay at the present resort and spend the vast majority of my time there. For me, Universal is more than just the theme parks. It's the totality of the close knit resort with so much to do besides just the parks.Not really. Don't get me wrong, I'm excited for Epic, but I wish that Nintendo/Potter went into USF and that Isle of Berk went into IOA. Monsters is really the only land that wouldn't have happened at either of the other parks. Epic Universe is exciting but (hot take incoming) kinda unnecessary.
Monsters, for a bit, was considered to replace MiB (from my understanding).Not really. Don't get me wrong, I'm excited for Epic, but I wish that Nintendo/Potter went into USF and that Isle of Berk went into IOA. Monsters is really the only land that wouldn't have happened at either of the other parks. Epic Universe is exciting but (hot take incoming) kinda unnecessary.
Wonder what that would have looked like? I'm guessing just the manor and some smaller buildings on the other side of the pathway.Monsters, for a bit, was considered to replace MiB (from my understanding).