KidZone Replacement Rumors & Speculation (Pt 2) | Page 14 | Inside Universal Forums

KidZone Replacement Rumors & Speculation (Pt 2)

  • Signing up for a Premium Membership is a donation to help Inside Universal maintain costs and offers an ad-free experience on the forum. Learn more about it here.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Doing stuff primarily for the little ones should be easy, fairly quick, and not majorly expensive. Most here would like something more substantial , but lets be honest, USF needs more stuff for the little
ones, IP's and attractions that would interest them. That's a shortcoming at USF, and is really needed more than an expensive E ticket. Heh, we have the rest of the park to enjoy. Unfortunately, this closure
probably extends the life of the horrible F&F attraction. That's the downside.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UniversalRBLX
My only concern is capacity. With essentially only the rethemed kiddie coaster as ride capacity in a new land, how on earth are they going to cope? To me, there needs to be something else. Doesn't have to be huge or expensive, but something else.
I mean, Epic Universe a year later *is* the capacity expansion. Simpsons will be on the chopping block not long after, so USF has plenty in the pipeline.
 
I'm happy AA and ET are staying, but that's pretty disappointing. Temporary never seems to be very temporary in the theme park world. Hopefully this just means they'll turn their attention elsewhere for additions after EU opens.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Henny
My only concern is capacity. With essentially only the rethemed kiddie coaster as ride capacity in a new land, how on earth are they going to cope? To me, there needs to be something else. Doesn't have to be huge or expensive, but something else.
DreamWorks Theatre makes the most sense to me. High capacity show that already has all the voice/animation work done. This project will probably take a year or more, I don't think it'll just be a basic retheme.
 
Doing stuff primarily for the little ones should be easy, fairly quick, and not majorly expensive. Most here would like something more substantial , but lets be honest, USF needs more stuff for the little
ones, IP's and attractions that would interest them. That's a shortcoming at USF, and is really needed more than an expensive E ticket. Heh, we have the rest of the park to enjoy. Unfortunately, this closure
probably extends the life of the horrible F&F attraction. That's the downside.
The thing is, the land needs that expensive E-ticket so families and kids actually have something to do in the land. Make it a big boat ride project that doesn't have a height restriction. Boom. Then you have a ride for everyone that should have good capacity, the kiddie coaster, and ET all within a short distance of each other.
 
Like conceptually I would like something more substantial if it weren't for EU, but taking that into consideration this seems like a good move. They're updating an insanely outdated area to be relevant to children and it sounds like they're not doing anything too major that they wouldn't make any changes in the future. Yes a good E-ticket would be nice but those usually have hight restrictions, young kids need something too!
 
Last edited:
Like conceptually I would like something more substantial if it weren't for EU, but taking that into consideration this seems like a good move. They're updating an insanely outdated area to be relevant to children and it sounds like they're not doing anything too major that they wouldn't make any changes in the future. Yes a good E-ticket would be nice but those usually have hight restrictions young kids need something too!
There are so many E-tickets that have no height restrictions.
 
Tbh I think it's way too early for anyone to assume anything. The only thing we know for sure is that whatever replaces this will be animation themed. We don't have an opening date or a timeline or permits or anything else. Let's just wait until more comes out before calling this a disappointment or a good addition.
 
Come on, I don't think that's quite fair.

Why does it have to be a "children's land" with the same stuff that's already there? Why can't it be a family-friendly land with, I don't know, a new dark ride or water ride?
It's not fair. The entire idea of a "children's land" doesn't belong at Universal, it belongs at a Six Flags park. Universal and Disney are supposed to embrace a broad audience and offer uniformly high quality. In fact, both Uni and Disney have family-friendly areas that still offer something for all audiences - Seuss and Fantasyland should be the model here, not a Looney Tunes play area.

And just from a crowd flow perspective, the area needs a significant attraction in the George spot as a draw to get guests to even walk through the rest of the zone. The current plans will leave it as it is now, an out-of-the-way backwater that even families bypass because there's no real reason to walk past ET.
 
I mean, it’s KidZone. It’s right there in the title. It’s for kids/families with kids.

Nintendo was going here, once upon a time. Was that going to be exclusively just for kids and families with kids?

My point is this: you can do something that still satisfies the current demographic that the current KidZone is intended for... that also appeals to the rest of us, too. And I think it's a wasted opportunity to not be thinking bigger with this piece of land.
 
I mean, it’s KidZone. It’s right there in the title. It’s for kids/families with kids.
Nintendo world is basically a kids zone that adults also have interest in. That is why it was slated to replace this area originally. Universal should absolutely be focused on building e ticket rides that kids and their families can both ride especially if they are serious about competing with Disney. Even a few of the more intense rides its crazy that Disney came up with a system that so many could ride on a low height requirement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Casper Gutman
The thing is, the land needs that expensive E-ticket so families and kids actually have something to do in the land. Make it a big boat ride project that doesn't have a height restriction. Boom. Then you have a ride for everyone that should have good capacity, the kiddie coaster, and ET all within a short distance of each other.
Come on, I don't think that's quite fair.

Why does it have to be a "children's land" with the same stuff that's already there? Why can't it be a family-friendly land with, I don't know, a new dark ride or water ride?
I just don't see anything like this getting added until after Epic Universe opens.

But I agree that even though it is a "KidZone", there should still be a more thrilling/family-friendly attraction featured within it.
 
For a simple retheme though, a January closure seems too far out. SeaWorld closed Penguin Encounter in January 2012, completely demolished the huge building, built a massive new multi-level penguin habitat and a large new dark ride (regardless of how good it was) in time for May 2013. It shouldn't take the same amount of time to reskin a few kids attractions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.