So the big takeaway is Studio parks have a high rate of turnover due to their designed nature of focusing on the latest fads and properties. Wow such original criticism, can’t wait for the screens thread to be revived.
...Is that the takeaway? Bourne is hardly a "fad property", and neither are the Minions, F&F, Pokemon, Simpsons, the Dreamworks properties they chose for DWL, Transformers, E.T., Potter. You could argue Fallon is a little time-locked, but while it's been brought up negatively a few times here, I think it's generally considered just mediocre. MiB and The Mummy are honestly the most 2000s-y of the IP we've got in the park still, and those are some of the most beloved rides we have at USF. HRRR is based off of the constantly changing world of Pop Music, yet has largely kept the track-list the same since the late 2000s, and is still just as popular with guests as anything else.
I really don't see "high turnover" being an issue that people are bringing up here. I could see the argument from a larger, historical perspective; Nicktoons, Twister, Disaster, Fievel, Barney. Lots of IP that just fell out of style or didn't hold like some others. But that's really not the case anymore, in my opinion. And if anything, I think most people here don't think the turnover rate is high
enough. People are asking for more change, and more expansion, and sooner.
People want evergreen IP like Simpsons, Transformers, F&F to go not because the IP aren't relevant anymore, but because the attractions attached to them are not holding up the park like they need to. I honestly don't get this post, and I respectfully feel like the goal is mostly to be snarky for it's own sake rather than actually adding to the discussion we're actually having.