- Jul 13, 2018
- 3,118
- 5,410
Those aren't based on the classic movies my guy.Unlike Revenge of the Mummy, your "favorite ride in the park".
Those aren't based on the classic movies my guy.Unlike Revenge of the Mummy, your "favorite ride in the park".
"This park has too many roller coasters," said no regular theme park guest ever.
The land isn't based on the classic movies. It's based on the characters with a completely new timeline and story.
Neither is this land.Those aren't based on the classic movies my guy.
Oh right, thanks for reminding me about the narrative conceit.Neither is this land.
Unlike Revenge of the Mummy, your "favorite ride in the park".
Indoors? Yeah. But if it's outdoors then I might feel a bit iffy. If the Potter VR rumor holds up, then we're looking at only three indoor rides for this entire park. That's not ideal.Would you feel better if, hypothetically, it was a themed spinning coaster?
The land isn't based on the classic movies. It's based on the characters with a completely new timeline and story.
The indoor ride discrepancy would be the same regardless, but I see your point.Indoors? Yeah. But if it's outdoors then I might feel a bit iffy. If the Potter VR rumor holds up, then we're looking at only three indoor rides for this entire park. That's not ideal.
Whatever it is, it's not a 1:1 recreation of the movies. It's using the movies as some inspiration, but it will be its own thing.Is this confirmed? I thought the leading rumor was that the land was going to be a modern-set "sequel" of sorts, with the original movies having happened at some point in the past.
Whatever it is, it has to be indoors.
IOA is a terrible park to be in when it rains.
Especially if Creature is indoorsI think this park was is probably the perfect mix of indoor and outdoor.
I’m going to assume if a coaster does happen, it will be outdoor to balance the land.
Especially if Creature is indoors
I truly don't understand the pushback against the minority of us who aren't inherently excited about a coaster just because it's a coaster. I never jab at you guys for your preferences.
And let me just explain my position with a bit more clarity:
If this coaster ends up being something that is well-themed (not Mummy level, but nicely filled-out) and seems to fit into the land, aesthetically and thematically, then I am more than fine with such a ride (assuming there aren't inversions and I can actually ride it). Ideally, it would be another indoor attraction (hence my general preference for a show), but whatever; if it looks good and justifies the mode of conveyance, terrific.
If it were to essentially just be a coaster dropped in there just to have a coaster, I wouldn’t love it.
That’s all. I don’t think that’s a terribly unreasonable view.
I think this park was is probably the perfect mix of indoor and outdoor.
I’m going to assume if a coaster does happen, it will be outdoor to balance the land.
True. Rather see one get cut now than a year later like Toon Lagoon. And actually have the space utilized.I'm a huge fan of theme park stage shows...BUT, I think three large stage shows (Dragons,Potter, & Monsters) would be a risky business strategy. I doubt that all three would play to sustaining crowds. So It's probably best that one goes away, and gets replaced by some type of ride. Otherwise, one of the three would probably end up being cut after a year or two. And we all know how the theme parks have become reluctant to pay for actors anyway.