Jamesh22
V.I.P. Member
- Mar 13, 2018
- 1,754
- 3,184
Not to get political over it, but after the disgusting tweets by JK, Eddie Redmayne speaking out against it, Ezra Millers issues, and Johnny Depp is always controversial, I think theres a very strong chance we don't even get another FB movies after this 3rd one. I think they're too far in to stop, but this franchise is dead. AND I WAS A FAN!!!!
Thrilled we're getting the Ministry here. Thankfully they didn't go the FB route, if they were ever going to. If people like me, were one of the very few who cared about these, doesn't care anymore, I cannot imagine theres like any excitement whatsoever here anymore. Kinda sad.
Not to get political over it, but after the disgusting tweets by JK, Eddie Redmayne speaking out against it, Ezra Millers issues, and Johnny Depp is always controversial, I think theres a very strong chance we don't even get another FB movies after this 3rd one. I think they're too far in to stop, but this franchise is dead. AND I WAS A FAN!!!!
Thrilled we're getting the Ministry here. Thankfully they didn't go the FB route, if they were ever going to. If people like me, were one of the very few who cared about these, doesn't care anymore, I cannot imagine theres like any excitement whatsoever here anymore. Kinda sad.
Without getting into politics, and it's hard to in this circumstance, I'm afraid even I am no longer excited for a new Wizarding World land at the new park. What was my most anticipated land, at least right now, and based how I feel today, just makes me sad to think about. I am attempting to disconnect what already exists in media and in the parks in my mind from the creator, but it'll be a hard sell for new content or new lands going forward for me.I have avoided posting about previous issues regarding Rowling's continued comments on a major social issue, because it is a potentially inflammatory topic. However at this point I do think this is a major issue going forward, for her as a creator and for the Wizarding World as a franchise. It's sad because there could have been some wonderful new material, but she was already struggling to keep that straight. With the current back lash, I don't see how she salvages a franchise without some major 180 in terms of PR and her stance on this issue. At the very least she has to try to reexamine her views on the question of language regarding transgender individuals.
I'm surprised she didn't consider that Danielle Radcliffe would have to respond given his continued resounding support for LGBT rights and the Trevor Project.
Without getting into a debate over it, this is definitely a major development for the WW franchise. I'm sad that we may be seeing the end of new stories in that world, at least for the forseeable future. I'm also sad to see an author that many people in the LGBT community greatly respected and admired (including myself) seemingly going out of her way to speak in exclusionary language. You don't have to fully understand the issue in order to lead with compassion and recognize that a black and white stance could be harmful to many.
I figure that what happens is she just ends up quietly slipping away. Warners and Universal fulfill their contractual obligation to consult with her, but do their own thing and don't include her in any marketing materials. She continues to tweet but her community becomes more insular and self-confirming.I have avoided posting about previous issues regarding Rowling's continued comments on a major social issue, because it is a potentially inflammatory topic. However at this point I do think this is a major issue going forward, for her as a creator and for the Wizarding World as a franchise. It's sad because there could have been some wonderful new material, but she was already struggling to keep that straight. With the current back lash, I don't see how she salvages a franchise without some major 180 in terms of PR and her stance on this issue. At the very least she has to try to reexamine her views on the question of language regarding transgender individuals.
I'm surprised she didn't consider that Danielle Radcliffe would have to respond given his continued resounding support for LGBT rights and the Trevor Project.
Without getting into a debate over it, this is definitely a major development for the WW franchise. I'm sad that we may be seeing the end of new stories in that world, at least for the forseeable future. I'm also sad to see an author that many people in the LGBT community greatly respected and admired (including myself) seemingly going out of her way to speak in exclusionary language. You don't have to fully understand the issue in order to lead with compassion and recognize that a black and white stance could be harmful to many.
Without getting into politics, and it's hard to in this circumstance, I'm afraid even I am no longer excited for a new Wizarding World land at the new park. What was my most anticipated land, at least right now, and based how I feel today, just makes me sad to think about. I am attempting to disconnect what already exists in media and in the parks in my mind from the creator, but it'll be a hard sell for new content or new lands going forward for me.
And this is me we're talking about. I like ALL new stuff coming to theme parks. I love ALL new rides based on anything. Hate the Transformers movies, can't sit through one of them, LOVE the ride. But even I apparently have a breaking point. And, that just sucks. Because Universal's best and most innovative rides have come from the Wizarding World.
Now, if somehow the land was based on the original stories and films, and somehow I was assured that the author had no part in it, I'd actually give it a pass. I want to try to be fair. I want to believe that I can.
Without getting into politics, and it's hard to in this circumstance, I'm afraid even I am no longer excited for a new Wizarding World land at the new park. What was my most anticipated land, at least right now, and based how I feel today, just makes me sad to think about. I am attempting to disconnect what already exists in media and in the parks in my mind from the creator, but it'll be a hard sell for new content or new lands going forward for me.
And this is me we're talking about. I like ALL new stuff coming to theme parks. I love ALL new rides based on anything. Hate the Transformers movies, can't sit through one of them, LOVE the ride. But even I apparently have a breaking point. And, that just sucks. Because Universal's best and most innovative rides have come from the Wizarding World.
Now, if somehow the land was based on the original stories and films, and somehow I was assured that the author had no part in it, I'd actually give it a pass. I want to try to be fair. I want to believe that I can.
I feel Potter 3.0 happens and nothing else. I’d have to imagine it’s too late to cut it right now, and they’ve publicly made their stance against. 3 lands for the hat trick then move right on to Nintendo and other properties and bring that same level and detail elsewhere.It's going to be interesting how Universal responds beyond what they've said already:
Universal Parks Responds to J.K. Rowling Tweets: “Our Core Values Include Diversity, Inclusion and Respect”
How much can one controversial tweetstorm cost? That's the burning question as Warner Bros., Universal Parks & Resorts and Scholastic execs all grapple with the fallout after Harry Potter author J.K. Rowling, 54, spent part of Sunday tweeting her views on cisgender and transgender women, who she...www.hollywoodreporter.com
I've been clear on my dislike for Potter and I'm a little giddy at the prospect of something else replacing it.
What if Universal decide to not build Potter Vol 3 and decide to just leave it blank for the time being and open the park with only 3 lands?
What if Universal decide to not build Potter Vol 3 and decide to just leave it blank for the time being and open the park with only 3 lands?
I would say the park still needs 4 lands, or at least the same amount of attractions, otherwise its going to be very unbalanced. I would be alright with something replacing Fantastic Beasts, but I get the feeling that Universal has always been internally excited about doing a Ministry attraction, since that ride concept has gone through multiple iterations across two parks.What if Universal decide to not build Potter Vol 3 and decide to just leave it blank for the time being and open the park with only 3 lands?
In order of personal preference: Last Airbender, Zelda, Kung Fu Panda, or whichever one of those USJ COOL Japan anime properties would translate best to the West.If they’re able to replace Potter with something new, that would be incredible. What that is I have no idea.
Lord Of The Rings has entered the chatIf they’re able to replace Potter with something new, that would be incredible. What that is I have no idea.
Not sure where to put this but they have a patent filed for a restraint system that looks like a vest with haptic feedback sensors installed into it
I don't think it's going to happen, but that'd be the thing to do it, IMOLord Of The Rings has entered the chat
Not sure where to put this but they have a patent filed for a restraint system that looks like a vest with haptic feedback sensors installed into it
I agree with the part about what she created with the books is something that matters beyond her recent tweets, however, we've read her statements and not reactionary tweets, and THAT is why we are upset. What she said is bigotry and that is why we are upset. People can have different opinions, but, there is still right and wrong as well.I actually found Rowling's comments to be extremely careful and thoughtful. I'd encourage people to actually read her essay as opposed to just reading reactionary tweets about it.
While I've always hoped for a world where people can agree to disagree without every difference of opinion becoming a morality play with sides and swords clearly drawn at the first hint of disagreement, apparently that world is as much of a fantasy land as the theme parks we love are. A world where disagreements don't automatically follow with accusations of "hate" and "bigotry"? Wouldn't that be something?
I always caution against becoming too enamored of any specific creator. Our heroes will always disappoint us because they are human. The creation is what matters and is far less corruptible. (Well, unless you entrust it to Benioff and Weiss, in which case, good luck.)
But more germane to the topic at hand, I don't foresee this having any impact on Universal's or WB's plans. I am sorry if it lessens anyone's anticipation for product in the pipeline, as anticipation and excitement are manifestations of hope, with hope being what we need most of these days.
I actually found Rowling's comments to be extremely careful and thoughtful. I'd encourage people to actually read her essay as opposed to just reading reactionary tweets about it.
While I've always hoped for a world where people can agree to disagree without every difference of opinion becoming a morality play with sides and swords clearly drawn at the first hint of disagreement, apparently that world is as much of a fantasy land as the theme parks we love are. A world where disagreements don't automatically follow with accusations of "hate" and "bigotry"? Wouldn't that be something?