I'm not saying second gate, but based on a recent survey, it seems USH is thinking big expansion.
Hmm.. now you've got me interested..
I'm not saying second gate, but based on a recent survey, it seems USH is thinking big expansion.
I'm not saying second gate, but based on a recent survey, it seems USH is thinking big expansion.
But you posted this in the 2nd Gate USH thread instead of say the Lower Lot Redesign thread. Are you forced to being tight-lipped about this?
I didn't take the survey, nor am I a USH passholder, but it does appear that USH doesn't want anyone talking about it based on twitter reaction and what friends have told me personally.
However, Lower Lot isn't the only possible expansion plot.
Are we talking about outside Universal City or just the upper lot?
Again I'm no insider, but they could use the Studio Tour plaza area, that's a solid 8 acres. They could replace WaterWorld which is a good 4 acres. If they did decide to ever build a 2nd park I've been saying for a while that the Falls lake area would be perfect since it's about 40 acres.
There's always the potential of removing more sound stages on the lower lot. So lots of possibilities, it's exciting.
Yes, they still have room for expansion. 8 acres is a nice sized land, 4 acres a nice mini-land.
Not sure if 40 acres is enough for a 2nd gate. ?
...I'm no Universal executive.
Where did that come from?
Haha Do you *think* Universal executives are leaning more towards 2nd gate or expansion?
They would have two undersized parks with virtually no room for expansion.
That is one big fat assumption right there. You don't know what Universal is willing to do. If it turns out that owning a theme park property in Hollywood is more profitable than running a movie studio - there is literally nothing stopping them from leveling the rest of the property. Not even history. Take note of recent patterns...
Assumption? Seriously how hard is it to understand that there is a current limitation on the amount of space they have unless they get more land?That is one big fat assumption right there. You don't know what Universal is willing to do. If it turns out that owning a theme park property in Hollywood is more profitable than running a movie studio - there is literally nothing stopping them from leveling the rest of the property. Not even history. Take note of recent patterns...
Assumption? Seriously how hard is it to understand that there is a current limitation on the amount of space they have unless they get more land?
Assumption? Seriously how hard is it to understand that there is a current limitation on the amount of space they have unless they get more land?