Those slushies were amazing. I had them all last weekend and they really do taste like their respective flavors. And I asked last weekends, they are all now non alcoholic.
Sad. They could make so much money by putting in a low ABV (similar to wine) and have that much more variety.Those slushies were amazing. I had them all last weekend and they really do taste like their respective flavors. And I asked last weekends, they are all now non alcoholic.
...we’re learning to reduce the need for pesticides by using natural predators like ladybugs and wasps to control pests.Meanwhile.. at Epcot...
Wasps+Tourists=YouTube Gold....we’re learning to reduce the need for pesticides by using natural predators like ladybugs and wasps to control pests.
Yes you can only get one drink at a time. In other words if you go to the bar and say "3 beers" they'll insist on seeing the 2 other people you're buying drinks for.What does "For example, we have a one-drink per-person, per-ID policy." mean? One drink at a time?
Yeah there's really two aspects. They don't want someone buying multiple drinks and binging. They can decide if someone should be cut off one drink at a time. Also and I think this is the bigger part, they don't want someone buying drinks for their group and then distributing them to members of their group under 21.I assume the lines for alcoholic drinks can be long and that is why some might want to load up. :saywhat:
So I am a little confused at the timing. Was the change in the drink policy a direct knee jerk reaction to the Sentinel article?
As someone who usually only enjoys one or maybe two drinks at HHN (we are DVC members and need to drive back to the mouse house so we tend to pregame lightly and then use the night to completely sober up for the trip back) I am getting really tired of jerks ruining it for those who know how to behave. I really night have liked to try one of those slushies, a nice way to cool off on what looks to be hot nights when we are there next weekend.
The change occurred before the article.
Is it possible that they got word of the article before it was published? Or would they have slapped it down if that was the case?
I guess if you really want to go a conspiracy route, we could speculate that Universal wanted to deflect some of the blame for the drink changes and asked them to write it to give them "something to respond to". Just to be clear I don't believe that, just an interesting thought.Is it possible that they got word of the article before it was published? Or would they have slapped it down if that was the case?
Hey Joe. Congrats on your photo in the Touring Plans Saturday Six article on HHN. :thumbsup:No.
The article reinforced some already held views but was not the cause.