I believe there is plenty of land in JP to capitalize on both JP and JW. I believe that this will be less ambitious than you guys are going. We'll get the JW arch on the Kong side. Thunder Falls will become a table service called Winston's Chophouse and the outside overlooking JPRA will become a covered deck called Margaritaville something. JPRA will get upgraded. They will find a way to snake the Gyrosphere around the trike plot and Camp Jurassic. And the Discovery Center gets an upgrade.
I've been to the singapore park. It is super compact. I mean you could walk around the park in 10 mins. I just hope that if they make a new ride they make it interesting and I have a few ideas on what they might do. Whatever they do I know universal can pole it off.All I have to say is, look at how Disneyland utilizes their space. Look at how Universal in Singapore also packs attractions in.
What's to say Universal can't get creative with Jurassic World attractions in IOA?
I still wish Universal not only kept the Kong attraction, but also went ahead with the Jurassic additions they once had planned.
There is a JP river raft ride in Singapore...wouldn't mind seeing Popeye rethemed to that
I was thinking because the rumor is that since toon lagon is rumored to maybe be Lord of the ring/hobbit it would be themed to the barrell riding in the movie. Thought it could be a cool idea. Or they could tear it down because that ride takes up a huge amount of space.There is a JP river raft ride in Singapore...wouldn't mind seeing Popeye rethemed to that
Have you seen the movie? They make it very clear that the old park and the new park are separate. They also make it very clear that the JP branding isn't welcome in JW. I think if this movie had kept those things more vague and perhaps if it didn't perform well they could get away with having JP and JW coexist. Too many people have seen the movie now for Universal to be able to merge JW into JP without some sort of themed explanation.I think you nailed it with what they could do with the space here.
I also don't buy the Jurassic Park died so that Jurassic World could live nonsense. I thought it was just called Jurassic World because that's the name of the entire resort: the theme park, shopping/dining complex, on-site hotel, etc. It's still essentially Jurassic Park, just re-branded.
Have you seen the movie? They make it very clear that the old park and the new park are separate. They also make it very clear that the JP branding isn't welcome in JW. I think if this movie had kept those things more vague and perhaps if it didn't perform well they could get away with having JP and JW coexist. Too many people have seen the movie now for Universal to be able to merge JW into JP without some sort of themed explanation.
As I said in previous suggestion there are many creative ways to do it and keep it in the theme, as in a preview center for Jurassic World as if it's under construction. To just throw the two together is very cheap and tacky and I really hope at this point in time Universal is above that. It would be equivalent to building Hogwarts Castle in Diagon Alley obviously the owners of that IP wouldn't allow that and I would hope that Universal has learned from those experiences and would still take the same care in theming even when their hand isn't forced.At some point though, you have to make allowances for real-life practicality. The only way to stay completely true to this new canon would be to demolish the whole of Jurassic Park and start again. That would be excessive and unnecessary. Ultimately, no one thinks they're in Jurassic World. They think they're in IOA, and if there's a cool new Jurassic World ride for them to enjoy alongside the Jurassic Park rides they know and love, they won't be complaining about a metastory 'plot hole'.
The question of theme park rides is a point of contention and would have to be settled through a costly court battle and so far it's nothing WB/Jackson want to take on with their money. Uni would have to foot the bill with no guarantees. Of course this was all talk before Uni pulled off the Potter stuff as a Proof of Work kinda thing.The Tolkien family will not allow LOTR/The Hobbit in any parks, they have said numerous times it is not something they will say yes to. His son detests all of the movies but had no choice as they did not control the movies rights, theme park rights are another matter and it will simply not happen.
Does everyone remember this video?
The Tolkien family will not allow LOTR/The Hobbit in any parks, they have said numerous times it is not something they will say yes to. His son detests all of the movies but had no choice as they did not control the movies rights, theme park rights are another matter and it will simply not happen.
Have you seen the movie? They make it very clear that the old park and the new park are separate. They also make it very clear that the JP branding isn't welcome in JW. I think if this movie had kept those things more vague and perhaps if it didn't perform well they could get away with having JP and JW coexist. Too many people have seen the movie now for Universal to be able to merge JW into JP without some sort of themed explanation.