- Apr 1, 2013
- 1,653
- 875
Ok.... I don't know how plussing a mediocre kids attraction is controversial? Really adding 4 person vehicles isn't a bad thing - the park needs another family-friendly ride so taking off the restrictions for this ride and increasing its capacity would do just the trick
Sometimes, the people on here are so easily annoyed about little things... all I did was offer an opinion on this new JP rumor - and I could care less about typos or slight mixups in a column titled "Newz" lol
I don't think anyone here has a problem with the idea of increasing the capacity, and extending the ride length. The problems come in with the reality of the thing. Right now the track is a circle that encapsulates the whole kids area. To expand the ride they would need to barge into one of the two spaces that could take a brand new ride, which could severely limit their options. If the capacity problems could have been solved by just changing out the RVs it would have been done a long time ago. Basically instead of fixing what they already have, they would need to knock it down and start again to achieve that. So you can see it would be a bigger hit when eventually they build 2 brand new rides, than 1 brand new ride and a rehash of a ride that is already there.
How many attractions are realistic with the land that's going to be used?
I am also not 100% sure what you mean. But there are two areas; behind Thunder Falls and the old Triceratops Encounter location. They are somewhere between 1.5 and 2 acres a piece, which could each take a medium sized ride.
Last edited: