I have to agree. Plus Epcot needs more decent rides. I hope this works out.I'll just say I loathe Malstrom and love Frozen.
I have to agree. Plus Epcot needs more decent rides. I hope this works out.I'll just say I loathe Malstrom and love Frozen.
OK.
I guess I am missing the joke here. If you are making fun of me, then yay for you.
- - - Updated - - -
to be honest, I didn't really think it was AMAZING or anything, just really well done, as Tangled was well done. It's no Lion King, or Beauty and the Beast, or Aladdin. At least in my eyes, but my daughter loves it, and she is the boss. ha ha.
Did you read the entire thread? In no way am I making fun of you, merely joking about how I said something and took it back. I made a comment and it was taken out of context and began a war (as my comments usually do for some reason :look I did the best I could to agree to disagree while expressing an opinion and then just asked if we could drop it and focus on the rumor vs the finical success of the film. Within 12 hours your comment was made… Hence my joke saying when I woke up this morning meaning I thought we were past this. Try and read the whole thing before you assume I'm poking fun.
Just read more of the background on the making of the film. If it is mega popular (as it most definitely is), then I say redo Maelstrom. Excellent fit for Disney and the World Showcase.
You know, i have this awful feeling that they will just rip out the Maelstrom and make a giant meet and greet. ha ha.
Frozen: $639,938,00 And maybe getting attraction
Monsters Inc made $562,816,256 it has no attraction and its prequel Monsters University made $743,559,607
Up made $731,342,744 it has no attraction
Wall-e made $521,311,860 it has no attraction
Really other films dont get attractions and this maybe does? :bang:
Frozen: $639,938,00 And maybe getting attraction
Monsters Inc made $562,816,256 it has no attraction and its prequel Monsters University made $743,559,607
Up made $731,342,744 it has no attraction
Wall-e made $521,311,860 it has no attraction
Really other films dont get attractions and this maybe does? :bang:
Ugh, not to be the Debbie Downer here, but this is yet another instance of Orlando theme parks steering away from original content and commercializing a very special pavilion. Now I get that from a business perspective, it's about the only way to grab the general public's attention nowadays... but I do miss the days when parks would do original content (excluding Antarctica: Empire of the Penguin).
If Epcot could get people to go from Pavilion to Pavilion with attractions rather than exhibits and boring shows, I think it'd be better off. I'm not so sure injecting animated film into the realism of the World Showcase is the best way of approaching it. If they took more of an Animal Kingdom approach but added entertaining content that people could RIDE, I think more people would accept it for what it is... but even Disney is IPing that park - so maybe I'm just talking out of my ass. It's my personal preference regardless
I was just joking, but considering World Showcase is considered a giant pub crawl to a lot of tourists, I see a princess meet and greet in the middle of it all pretty humorous.