not to disrespect anyone on any levels,
to say FJ is not a groundbreaking ride and is a not that special,
are probably the same people who said AVATAR is not a game changer, the CG are normal, and 3D is just a fad.
is the same thing. You might think this way, because maybe it didnt fill some of the expectations and hype from your views.
Still, in the end, it si technological break thru to marriage all tech that we know of now into one.
Which is a feat, like Avatar, while you may think it is a bunch of stuff thats already been there.
but still, that no one has tried to do it.
It is always until, SOMEONE actually did it, changes the game.
Spiderman was also a old tech marriage into one.
Indy Platform Vehicles + T2-3D screens
And FJ is no different
Soaring + BTTF/Simpsons + Spidey
when Spidey came out, loads of copies and clones (DarKastle 4D ride) came out.
You can be sure now, copies and crap clones of FJ
roboarm, leg hanging, in a projection dome + dark ride elements will start
appearing in Europe and China.
of course cheaply made. (if anyone know what I am talking about, we all have seen fake Spiderman
made by the Chinese company, FantaRides.)
While personally I understand the fact that FJ cant be intense due to
Potter is for kids.
I do hope eventually they will tweak the ride programming into more thrilling,
as theme park guests desires.
You just cant dog this ride man.
NO ONE, not even Disney had the balls to marriage these tech into a ride.
After spidey busted Disney on rides, they went back strengthen their living character intiative,
which they are best at. Even Little Mermaid and Carsland or all old tech rides, only
with better characters and story telling.
So, what did FJ change?
you bet, newer roboarm rides in the future, with 3D screens + whatever, indoor coasters track, whatever.
It will happen, and that is only because FJ was made and changed the game.
Come on, can you really categorize FJ?
Is it a simulator? A Dark ride? A hanging IMAX dome ride?
it isnt and at the same time it is all of it.
I understand, why they didnt do 3D,
because it will never hold on your head sitting in a roboarm.
I bet, they could have done it. but logistically, probably difficult.