Here's a crazy idea: what if this Fallon attraction could be a little different every day?...
Here's a crazy idea: what if this Fallon attraction could be a little different every day?...
I dont think they would actually keep up with that for long. And capacity..? Is a humongous deal. I dont understand how you could say it isnt.
If Soarin can handle 87 and this ride can handle 72...depending on the length of the ride, that's not that big of a difference. You have to realize that capacity is all relative. For a park like Epcot, a ride that only holds 87 people per cycle leads to ridiculous wait times. In a park like Universal Studios, which hosts way less people in a given day but has way more attractions to spread people out through...well there ya go. Relatively speaking, it is not *that* big of a deal.
Argument not good... Soarin has two theaters and therefore a capacity of 174, and capacity is still a horror show.
didnt you JUST say a few pages back you thought two of these things could fit?
Argument not good... Soarin has two theaters and therefore a capacity of 174, and capacity is still a horror show.
I have a feeling this will be odd qwerky fun. Everything thing I have heard makes no sense and seems absurd. Count me in!!!!I can't imagine something with as narrow an appeal as The Tonight Show for an amusement park attraction.
I'd rather have Twister turned into the "Sharknado 2 Experience". It's already a SyFy (NBC/Universal) property, it preserves some of the cool Twister effects, it's very 'New Yorky' to fit in it's park location, you could have Jimmy Fallon get eaten - and I'm sure they have some unused sharks laying around.
Better than predictable and boring I supposeI have a feeling this will be odd qwerky fun. Everything thing I have heard makes no sense and seems absurd. Count my in!!!!
If Soarin can handle 87 and this ride can handle 72...depending on the length of the ride, that's not that big of a difference. You have to realize that capacity is all relative. For a park like Epcot, a ride that only holds 87 people per cycle leads to ridiculous wait times. In a park like Universal Studios, which hosts way less people in a given day but has way more attractions to spread people out through...well there ya go. Relatively speaking, it is not *that* big of a deal.
I can tell you with confidence that capacity is literally one of the biggest factors considered in designing attractions. And yes throughput is relative. Yes Epcot takes in more guests but half of their park is a world showcase. All of those pavillions are attractions and give guests something to do for a majority of their day. Universal depends on their rides and shows to give guests something to do. Soarin doesn't have good throughput but that doesn't make it okay. Despicable Me doesn't have good throughput but again that's not ideal. When they built Despicable me in California they doubled the amount of ride vehicles because any good theme park knows that long lines are the biggest dissatisfier for guests and they keep people from spending money around the park.
And so I say again... It is a "big deal."
And the fact that your username is 'capacity' hahaha...I think this is a new lesson for the parks...guests spend when they are on the streets...I don't know if anyone has waited in the Despicable line, but it is quite a drag...I always know how the peeps in Roller Coaster Tycoon feel when they say "I've been waiting in this line for ages"...