In this way, it hurts speculation that Seek and Destroy was just this, and that the reviews were middling at best… without nearly enough victims. If I were an executive, and you were trying to sell me on the rights, I’d point to both Seek and Destroy and Saw houses of the past to show that these sorts of IPs don’t really work.
Also, if you thought enforcement of a costume ban was bad this year, imagine what it would be like during a Squid Games experience. The amount of badly behaved guests actively hurting Scareactors to “win”, people changing into jumpsuits after crossing the turnstiles to do TikTok dances in front of the stages, and the larger fan community saying “this isn’t scary” might not make it worth it.
But, consider that Seek and Destroy DID get greenlit, as have Saw, Run, and a variety of other high-concept dystopia haunts over the years, each having similar complaints, I can’t see why the people that approved those past zones wouldn’t want to try again. Especially considering that one of the designers (apologies for blanking on his name) had called Seek and Destroy his “baby”, I wonder if he might want another go at it.